All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition

Trollololololol

AR-180729818.jpg&MaxH=500&MaxW=900
 
Hey herby, I want you to try to use your brain on this one: why would the overall strength of the opponent matter to a QB? Does the QB face off against the opponent’s offense and defense, or just the opponent’s defense?

If the QB is only facing the opponent’s defense, why should the opponent’s offense factor in to the perceived difficulty of opponent that the QB is facing?


BJ, you are slower than I thought. Does the OC change their gameplan if the other offense rings up 3 TDS and takes a 21-0 lead? Does your coach change the play calling if you return a couple punts back for easy score and are up 28 points at half?
 
Yeah, that’s a pretty poor fitting suit. Stanley could definitely use a little fashion advice, or at least a tailor- that much is for sure.
That isn't 242. He is easily 260.

It isn't the coat that makes him look fat.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: benjimill
We'll now open the floor for questions:

Q: Nate, tell us something about yourself that makes you different from other quarterbacks.

NS: Good question. Let me think about that. Well, every time I throw a pass, I say a little silent prayer. That's something I've done since middle school. Also, I've never peed standing up. Next question?
 
BJ, you are slower than I thought. Does the OC change their gameplan if the other offense rings up 3 TDS and takes a 21-0 lead? Does your coach change the play calling if you return a couple punts back for easy score and are up 28 points at half?

Of course. How is that relevant? Are you of the opinion that overall strength of schedule is a better barometer of the challenges a QB faces than the quality of defenses he faces? Because if so, that is a really, really, really, really, really dumb thing to think.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: rholtgraves
Of course. How is that relevant? Are you of the opinion that overall strength of schedule is a better barometer of the challenges a QB faces than the quality of defenses he faces? Because if so, that is a really, really, really, really, really dumb thing to think.

If Kempt played a tougher schedule than Stanley but played much easier defenses it makes me wonder what type of pathetic offenses the great Phil Parker gets to go against week in and week out
 
  • Creative
Reactions: benjimill
Of course. How is that relevant? Are you of the opinion that overall strength of schedule is a better barometer of the challenges a QB faces than the quality of defenses he faces? Because if so, that is a really, really, really, really, really dumb thing to think.


You are hawk smart. Don’t let anyone tell you different. Comprehension, wow.
 
Hey herby, I want you to try to use your brain on this one: why would the overall strength of the opponent matter to a QB? Does the QB face off against the opponent’s offense and defense, or just the opponent’s defense?

If the QB is only facing the opponent’s defense, why should the opponent’s offense factor in to the perceived difficulty of opponent that the QB is facing?

Situational football. Throw when you need to (a la vs OU last year), go conservative when you don't (a la TCU last year).

With that said, we've already been round and round how you discount all the metrics between Kempt and Stanley, so I don't expect any different from you. Keep being you, you.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: benjimill

Help Support Us

Become a patron