Yeah - our conversations had always been about his offer list.https://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/threads/iowa-football-recruiting.218752/page-739#post-5972607
You changed one of my posts saying McDonald chose ISU over New Mexico. Troll
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah - our conversations had always been about his offer list.https://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/threads/iowa-football-recruiting.218752/page-739#post-5972607
You changed one of my posts saying McDonald chose ISU over New Mexico. Troll
Yeah - our conversations had always been about his offer list.
I've stated MULTIPLE times that I thought he was a good get. Our conversation has only ever been about offers.Which obviously implies he wasn't a good get because he only chose us over New Mexico, which Twins stated wasn't true and confirmed via Halsted. Now that we've explained it 49 different ways, I'm done with you, troll.
I've stated MULTIPLE times that I thought he was a good get. Our conversation has only ever been about offers.
I can. I said they’re very different from each other. You said that it was proof of his argument. That is literally not true. What am I not getting? I love to learn!
@CyTwins is probably the most respected member on this board. He runs circles around you hok fans. I'm nothing like him. I just type what I see, but he has a lot more information to back up his points. I don't deserve to be compared to him in any way.
Cheese and rice.. Read the following quote from CyTwins 10 times, you might catch on.
How so? I told you Auburn wanted him, you mocked that and now they're saying this:
Side note: I was told true freshman defensive end Will McDonald is the best player this staff has ever recruited to Ames.
That wasn't his side note. That was a direct quote from a writer. Maybe that's what you're not getting? He was literally using that side note from whoever wrote it to add to his point that McDonald had an Auburn offer. If he wanted to argue a different point, he could have @'d someone who said McDonald wasn't a good recruit. But he chose to argue my point that McDonald did not have an Auburn offer and used the side note as evidence. This isn't hard.
@CyTwins doesn't need an alt. I think alts. are only something the hok fans that keep getting banned on here create.
Nebraska will soon jump Iowa just because of Frost. KF is probably the 5th best coach in the Big Ten West now behind Chryst, Frost, Brohm and Fitzgerald
If you're not trolling you need to seek help because I've never seen someone so dense
******* agreed.
Did you miss the post where he said it was confirmed on 247? Just because he responded to that post doesn't mean that's his proof he had an Auburn offer. Twins stated that he thought he was going to end up being right about the recruit, because some posters were implying or outright stating that he wasn't a noteworthy get. If you're going to quote past posts, make sure you actually understand what's going on in them. JFC.
Why would he @ me after months of the conversation being gone when I never said a word about McDonald's talent?
https://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/threads/iowa-football-recruiting.218752/page-739#post-5972607
You changed one of my posts saying McDonald chose ISU over New Mexico. Troll
Yeah - our conversations had always been about his offer list.
Which obviously implies he wasn't a good get because he only chose us over New Mexico, which Twins stated wasn't true and confirmed via Halsted. Now that we've explained it 49 different ways, I'm done with you, troll.
I've stated MULTIPLE times that I thought he was a good get. Our conversation has only ever been about offers.
When? You literally mocked his offer list by going back and changing my post
Undesirable types.Once again, I ask, ask Miller or the HR manager to allow him, benji, and derpy back onto a hawk board and maybe this crap will end.
Undesirable types.
Fant and Montgomery both on the list
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nc...tball-for-2018/ss-BBLIB6U?li=BBnb7Kz#image=32
I would normally predict the big ten west like this.
1) Wisconsin
2) lately NW
3) Iowa
4) Nebraska
5)Minnesota
6) Purdue
7) Illinois
This is my normal go to before looking at schedule (which I don’t look at for the most part). This could flip 2/3 and 5/6 , I see them as close.
I will say Purdue is on a bit of a rise so I would probably move them to 4. No idea on frost, if he can perform his UCF magic, they would be up on the 1-2 range area.
Apparently. And don't worry, I linked the only page that mattersMSN has a top 50 college football list? Also, I don't do slide shows.
Not according to @benjimill he'd rather have Kirk.K State is quite a bit better than Iowa
Not according to @benjimill he'd rather have Kirk.
KState had 5 top 10 finishes in 6 years under Snyder.
I then asked if any B1G West team has done that in the last 50 years and heard nothing.
I'd say so....KSU was arguably the worst P5 team historically when he took over.Snyder is probably the greatest coach in the last 30 years of college football.
Snyder is probably the greatest coach in the last 30 years of college football.
An argument could be made....Snyder might be the greatest coach ever.
I'd say so....KSU was arguably the worst P5 team historically when he took over.
Snyder might be the greatest coach ever.