All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition

[CyTwins]

Starts werent the only stats posted for every other position group.

What a terrible response. Like I said, I knew you couldnt be objective.

What other stats do you want to go off of for the OL?

 

[YeahBuddy]

What other stats do you want to go off of for the OL?

There isnt much you can use, its probably the hardest group to evaluate.

 

[CyTwins]

There isnt much you can use, its probably the hardest group to evaluate.

ISU's LBers had more tackles last year than Iowa's. Do you think ISU's LB unit was the best in the state last year?

 

[CyTwins]

Makes sense an "Iowa State fan" like @rholtgraves would forget this guy even existed

 

[YeahBuddy]

ISU's LBers had more tackles last year than Iowa's. Do you think ISU's LB unit was the best in the state last year?

If you just want to look at tackles, sure. But Iowa's more complete group of LB's forced and recovered more fumbles and defensed more passes.

 

[CyTwins]

If you just want to look at tackles, sure. But Iowa's more complete group of LB's forced and recovered more fumbles and defensed more passes.

Pretty much a wash then

 

[YeahBuddy]

Pretty much a wash then

I wouldnt argue with that.

 

[CyTwins]

I wouldnt argue with that.

I'm shocked you are saying a LB unit with Lanning was a wash with a LB unit with Jewell. I'm impressed actually

 

[YeahBuddy]

I'm shocked you are saying a LB unit with Lanning was a wash with a LB unit with Jewell. I'm impressed actually

Again, I can be objective. You should give it a try.

 

[CyTwins]

Again, I can be objective. You should give it a try.

What am I not objective about? ISU plays a 3 man front and 2 of them are all conference guys

 

[JP4CY]

Again, I can be objective. You should give it a try.

Just because you say you can be doesn't mean you are.

 

[YeahBuddy]

What am I not objective about? ISU plays a 3 man front and 2 of them are all conference guys

You spent half a day on here talking about the depth the ISU DL has. Now you only mention 2 guys.

Iowa DL > ISU DL

Iowa WR/TE > ISU WR/TE

 

[CyTwins]

You spent half a day on here talking about the depth the ISU DL has. Now you only mention 2 guys.

Iowa DL > ISU DL

Iowa WR/TE > ISU WR/TE

No

Now you're just trolling

 

[YeahBuddy]

No

Now you're just trolling

Hard to argue against the stats but go ahead and try.

 

[CyTwins]

Hard to argue against the stats but go ahead and try.

You argue against stats that say Kempt is better than Stanley all the time

 

[YeahBuddy]

You argue against stats that say Kempt is better than Stanley all the time

There are stats in favor of both of them.

I could see the WR/TE debate being a push if thats what you are hung up on but a 10 TD difference returning is significant.

 

[CyTwins]

There are stats in favor of both of them.

I could see the WR/TE debate being a push if thats what you are hung up on but a 10 TD difference returning is significant.

The stats overwhelmingly favor Kempt. Stanley was a fumbling machine, Kempt was a lot more accurate and both averaged 2 TD's per game. QBR isn't some meaningless stat and it favors Kempt by a lot and Kempt played a more difficult schedule

 

[CyArob]

How do you guys not get tired of this?

 

[CyTwins]

The stats overwhelmingly favor Kempt. Stanley was a fumbling machine, Kempt was a lot more accurate and both averaged 2 TD's per game. QBR isn't some meaningless stat and it favors Kempt by a lot and Kempt played a more difficult schedule

How do you disagree with this @YeahBuddy

 

[YeahBuddy]

The stats overwhelmingly favor Kempt. Stanley was a fumbling machine, Kempt was a lot more accurate and both averaged 2 TD's per game. QBR isn't some meaningless stat and it favors Kempt by a lot and Kempt played a more difficult schedule

Kempt threw for less than 2 TD per game. Stanley threw for right at 2 per game.