Rhoads couldn't recruit, cmc has already proven he can.
He hasnt even cracked the Top 50 nationally with any of his classes since being at ISU.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rhoads couldn't recruit, cmc has already proven he can.
I also said Iowa can keep great coaches which is what real programs do. Why can’t iSu do that?
LOLI also said Iowa can keep great coaches which is what real programs do. Why can’t iSu do that?
You say that with no real proof. Kirk has played the AD like a fiddle.
He’s been at ISU for 2 years, not 20.He hasnt even cracked the Top 50 nationally with any of his classes since being at ISU.
He hasnt even cracked the Top 50 nationally with any of his classes since being at ISU.
He’s been at ISU for 2 years, not 20.
What is your point?
It should be obvious. CMC hasnt proven he can recruit if he cant even land a Top 50 class.
It should be obvious. CMC hasnt proven he can recruit if he cant even land a Top 50 class.
How is it irrelevant?
First Class('16) - Had just four months to compile, program in a heaping pileIt should be obvious. CMC hasnt proven he can recruit if he cant even land a Top 50 class.
Here is a good rundown of the 2 star success KF has had at Iowa.
https://iowa.rivals.com/news/top-two-star-recruits-of-the-ferentz-era
How about Kirk...is 19 years enough of a trend to accurately reflect just over 7 wins a year? Is that a good HC?actually I am saying one year is not a trend. You made the claim BF wouldn’t be a good HC because of one season as a OC. I simply replied that one year isn’t not a trend as shown with CMC’s first year.
Recruiting rankings don't matter according to Iowa fans I thought?