Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So Sanderson's sources that come from Iowa are legit but a national guys sources that come from neutral parties aren't legit? Lol He said his info came from more than just Brock on the situation FWIW and thinks it's hilarious Iowa fans actually believe what they were told
Again, I cant blame the guy for having bad sources or for Brock saying some things out of frustration or anger.
You think Blair Sanderson has better sources in college recruiting than the Director of Recruiting for 247? LOL!
Don't you think that more than one connection, in this case, is more credible?Better connections for Iowa recruiting? Yes.
Better connections for Iowa recruiting? Yes.
Don't you think that more than one connection, in this case, is more credible?
You pretty much have 2 direct sources in these cases, the Iowa staff or the prospect.
Brock told Rivals that Iowa cancelled the visit, his own mom posted a vague tweet about it.
Alrighty, so what are you trying to prove with this argument? Its been regurgitated so many times amongst this thread, that I'm not exactly positive. What is the benefit to your argument if Brock was asked not to come on his visit?You pretty much have 2 direct sources in these cases, the Iowa staff or the prospect.
Brock told Rivals that Iowa cancelled the visit, his own mom posted a vague tweet about it.
Alrighty, so what are you trying to prove with this argument? Its been regurgitated so many times amongst this thread, that I'm not exactly positive. What is the benefit to your argument if Brock was asked not to come on his visit?
Yeah, I get that. But this has been an ongoing argument since before that had come out. I just don't get the point he is trying to make by taking the stance he is. That's why I asked him directly, I'm genuinely curious.He's trying to prove the Director of Recruiting for 247 is wrong so he can say Iowa didn't want Brock since ISU is going to land him. This is literally a nightmare for Hawkeye fans
Alrighty, so what are you trying to prove with this argument? Its been regurgitated so many times amongst this thread, that I'm not exactly positive. What is the benefit to your argument if Brock was asked not to come on his visit?
Alright, so Iowa moved on from him for what reason? Because he was taking too long to commit? Because they didn't think he was good enough? Because they just pulled his offer? I understand what happened, but why do you think? And why do you feel such a strong need to defend it?My point is Iowa moved on from him, nothing more nothing less. A couple of posters seem to find that difficult to understand.
Alright, so Iowa moved on from him for what reason? Because he was taking too long to commit? Because they didn't think he was good enough? Because they just pulled his offer? I understand what happened, but why do you think?
Blair Sanderson said they were taking two RB's in this class but his sources were wrong and they are only taking one now is what I was told from Buddy
Yes
Recruiting is fluid obviously
Alright, so Iowa moved on from him for what reason? Because he was taking too long to commit? Because they didn't think he was good enough? Because they just pulled his offer? I understand what happened, but why do you think? And why do you feel such a strong need to defend it?
Couple of reasons from what I read.
The main reason is because of how small this class will be for Iowa, probably less than 20, and the need to focus available rides on other positions after landing Goodson.
I am not going to share the other reason as I question the validity of it.
Blair said all along Goodson and Brock were both takes right? He even said Brock was 1A and Goodson was 1B
Recruiting is fluid obviously
You are the fox in this fableCouple of reasons from what I read.
The main reason is because of how small this class will be for Iowa, probably less than 20, and the need to focus available rides on other positions after landing Goodson.
I am not going to share the other reason as I question the validity of it.