It's amazing how much ToE fans hate Nebraska... when they sound more and more like Nebraska fans every day.What does that have to do with now? You sound like a Nebraska football fan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's amazing how much ToE fans hate Nebraska... when they sound more and more like Nebraska fans every day.What does that have to do with now? You sound like a Nebraska football fan
Congrats?
I mean did an Iowa fan really ask if Niang could dunk when he dunked in Carver? That's pretty dumb
I dont remember every single dunk by an opposing player in CHA.
Well the place is usually empty.......I mean did an Iowa fan really ask if Niang could dunk when he dunked in Carver? That's pretty dumb
I bet you knew Niang could dunk though
I dont remember every single dunk by an opposing player in CHA.
I didnt know for sure but I wouldnt have questioned it.
You guys are sensitive today. I simply said ISU fans think finishing in the top 4-7 will be a tournament lock. I have had multiple people say ISU should finish there. So I said ISU fans think ISU is a lock for the tournament next year.
I also have pointed out that Locure has not been bad this AAU season and is getting looks from Kansas State and Iowa, also Minnesota has been watching his games. Now that Carton has released a top 6, Expect more teams in the midwest to evaluate Locure and Terry. It is a small crop of PGs this year for the 2019 cycle.
Follow the twitter handle of the beyond ball AAU to get more updates if you do not believe me.
BTW, sorry to the ISU fans that have been objective and have had good dialogue. I am just tired of facts being ignored is all.
Well, congrats on your historical success, I guess?
Too bad history doesn't determine ranking within the last few years or so, like we've been discussing.
Yes, dunked on Iowa before too
According to the BPI formula, the big 12 gets a nod as the best conference because they only have 10 teams but they have the least likely hood of winning a national title. They also say it is because their are no bottom feeders because of this. So the 10 team conference is benefit to overall rank, not a terrible team makes it easier to be the best, and this also limits them when it comes to winning a national title. So I am left to wonder how is this benefitting the teams in the big 12 if there is a lesser chance of winning a championship?
I bet you knew Niang could dunk though
Did you place a large bet against yourself in this argument?
Was he a better dunker than Woody? I seriously do not remember that part of his game.
No I am simply showing you how the advanced metrics model is flawed
How do they define "lesser chance of winning"? Obviously having less teams overall produces less opportunities for a team to rise up and win a Natty, that's useless information. It'd be nice if they elaborated more on their exact point with that.According to the BPI formula, the big 12 gets a nod as the best conference because they only have 10 teams but they have the least likely hood of winning a national title. They also say it is because their are no bottom feeders because of this. So the 10 team conference is benefit to overall rank, not a terrible team makes it easier to be the best, and this also limits them when it comes to winning a national title. So I am left to wonder how is this benefitting the teams in the big 12 if there is a lesser chance of winning a championship?
Was he a better dunker than Woody? I seriously do not remember that part of his game.
No I am simply showing you how the advanced metrics model is flawed
Yeah man Niang was so good