Kempt was marginally more accurate than Stanley. Stanley turned the ball over a lot at the beginning of the season and improved greatly as the season went along. Iowa’s OL was bad in pass protection; I don’t know enough about Iowa State’s OL to form an opinion about whether Iowa’s was better.
All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition
- Thread starter YeahBuddy
- Start date
Kempt was marginally more accurate than Stanley. Stanley turned the ball over a lot at the beginning of the season and improved greatly as the season went along. Iowa’s OL was bad in pass protection; I don’t know enough about Iowa State’s OL to form an opinion about whether Iowa’s was better.
So to summarize
Yes
Yes
Iowa's OL wasn't good
I can handle that. Now you know why you look silly arguing about the Fumbler compared to a player like Kempt
Wisconsin’s defense manhandled Iowa’s OL. Stanley had no time to throw, and when he did his receivers were never open. The OL couldn’t open holes on the ground, and Iowa didn’t have the players to create YAC in the short passing game (other than Wadley, who Wisconsin did a good job of covering out of the backfield). Maybe it was on the OC for not calling a better game, but with Iowa’s personnel at a complete mismatch, I’m not sure what Stanley could have been expected to do.
So basically for you, it boils down to Kempt having less turnovers? That’s what makes him better in your mind?
Turnovers are a huge deal and hes more accurate so yeah. 66% to 55% is a gigantic margin.
You literally think Stanley is better because he has a strong arm like Jantz
The adjusted completion percentage was within 1.6%. That is a marginal difference.
Last edited:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/247spo...-players-during-the-2017-season-113156530/Amp
Edit: within 1.6%, not 1.5%.
Once again, you get offered stats/facts and come back with a troll. Well done.
Well there you have it. His completely objective eye test is a far better indicator of a better qb than stats. End of thread.
I seriously don't get this thought process. Statistically Kempt is one of the best returning QBs returning this year in college football and you guys talk like he's not good
Derp, Stanley threw for more yards, had more TD's with less weapons to throw to and played a much tougher schedule than Kempt did.
Garza is better offensively than Lard just like Kempt is better offensively than Stanley.
Seriously why don't you think Kempt is good? It's weird
Pretty sure he's the first QB from either school to do that in a season, ever.
Stanley probably has some nice potential and from what I could tell he probably fits Iowa's offense. But if his career doesn't go all that well it wouldn't be the first time Iowa's hype machine was ahead of a QB's actual talent.