My Pledge—No More Trolling

[YeahBuddy]

Coaches poll is a joke and half the time they don't even do it. Coaches actually vote for all conference teams

Troll.

Its because Stanley received votes in the Coaches poll. Youre so lame.

 

[cyhiphopp]

Why are you using the coaches selections instead of the media?

Troll

For someone who is done trolling, you're sure throwing out a lot of inflammatory statements.

 

[benjimill]

Hey @benjimill what's that column on the right side of Barrett's stats?
https://www.foxsports.com/college-football/jt-barrett-player-stats

Lmao, someone doesn’t know there is a difference between QBR and QB Rating.

 

[CyTwins]

Troll.

Its because Stanley received votes in the Coaches poll. Youre so lame.

No he didn't. Derp

 

[CyTwins]

Buddy and Twins, get a room. It is the same 3 or 4 arguments repeatedly happening.

As for Kempt/Stanley, who cares? Both are good QB's for what each offense is trying to do as evidenced by their numbers.

I don't think either would succeed at dropping back and slinging it around 45 times a game.

Kempt was just a lot better last year which is a fact not an opinion

 

[YeahBuddy]

Buddy and Twins, get a room. It is the same 3 or 4 arguments repeatedly happening.

As for Kempt/Stanley, who cares? Both are good QB's for what each offense is trying to do as evidenced by their numbers.

I don't think either would succeed at dropping back and slinging it around 45 times a game.

Stanley threw the ball 41 times at ISU last year and seemed to do OK.

 

[JP4CY]

Lmao, someone doesn’t know there is a difference between QBR and QB Rating.

So no one else uses QBR, no one?

 

[YeahBuddy]

No he didn't. Derp

My bad, media poll. Hard to keep my terms straight when you continually flip from media polls and coaches polls to fit your argument.

 

[TheJackWePack5]

Stanley threw the ball 41 times at ISU last year and seemed to do OK.

Right.

Definitely worked for them once KCM went out. Having him out 2nd half and missing Wilkerson was big for the passing D.

 

[YeahBuddy]

For someone who is done trolling, you're sure throwing out a lot of inflammatory statements.

Well look at him. Pretty obvious he is trolling. He is never in non troll mode on the ISR forum.

 

[benjimill]

I’ve got news for you. Someone “made up” each and every adjusted or advanced metric.

You cherry pick one “made up” stat that your guy narrowly beats out the other guy. Then willfully ignore all the composite data that suggests otherwise.

You do realize their rating is basically an opponent adjusted version of what the NFL uses, right?

I don’t think you really understand what’s going on here. QBR is an advanced formula that has a bunch of inputs that no one outside of ESPN knows how to calculate (I could be wrong, but I don’t think they have posted a formula). Adjusted completion percentage simply does not count dropped passes, throwaways, batted balls, etc. against the QB as an incomplete pass. Using objective reasoning, which stat do you think is more useful for measuring a QB’s performance?

 

[jmb]

My bad, media poll. Hard to keep my terms straight when you continually flip from media polls and coaches polls to fit your argument.

You getting wrecked. Feel sorry for you. I am almost embarrassed for you.

 

[CyTwins]

Well look at him. Pretty obvious he is trolling. He is never in non troll mode on the ISR forum.

Saying Kempt is better than Stanley which is a fact by a large margin based off statistics and even what league coaches think is not a troll

 

[CyTwins]

I don’t think you really understand what’s going on here. QBR is an advanced formula that has a bunch of inputs that no one outside of ESPN knows how to calculate (I could be wrong, but I don’t think they have posted a formula). Adjusted completion percentage simply does not count dropped passes, throwaways, batted balls, etc. against the QB as an incomplete pass. Using objective reasoning, which stat do you think is more useful for measuring a QB’s performance?

Well who had a higher adjusted completion percentage?

 

[cycloner29]

Buddy and Twins, get a room. It is the same 3 or 4 arguments repeatedly happening.

As for Kempt/Stanley, who cares? Both are good QB's for what each offense is trying to do as evidenced by their numbers.

I don't think either would succeed at dropping back and slinging it around 45 times a game.

We've heard like 10 different versions of the same crap all the time. You guys need to come up with new material!! I see mashed taters is now benji the dog. Whatever happened to Chumps? Think they both need timeouts for awhile.

 

[JP4CY]

QBR is an advanced formula that has a bunch of inputs that no one outside of ESPN knows how to calculate (I could be wrong, but I don’t think they have posted a formula).

 

[benjimill]

Well who had a higher adjusted completion percentage?

Kempt did. I already told you that. But it was by a marginal amount, so if Stanley was wildly inaccurate, Kempt must have been...dangerously inaccurate? Recklessly inaccurate? I don’t know, what’s a synonym for marginally less wild than “wildly”?

 

[YeahBuddy]

You getting wrecked. Feel sorry for you. I am almost embarrassed for you.

Typing "coaches" instead of "media" is getting wrecked? Thats not true.

 

[CyTwins]

Kempt did.

So Kempt was more accurate and turned the ball over less. Not sure what you're even arguing at this point

 

[cyhiphopp]

Well look at him. Pretty obvious he is trolling. He is never in non troll mode on the ISR forum.

Oh, my bad. I thought we were in the thread started by Yeahbuddy stating he will troll no more. Not the thread that CyTwins never started saying he wont go double barreled after every troll on this board.

Easy mistake. Could happen to anyone really.