If there is somebody on this board that shouldn't make fun of predictions made by others, it's probably you.
13-5 will always be on the worst predictions ever. He also said Butler and Wadley would both be better than Montgomery which is up there
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If there is somebody on this board that shouldn't make fun of predictions made by others, it's probably you.
13-5 will always be on the worst predictions ever. He also said Butler and Wadley would both be better than Montgomery which is up there
You predicted 13-5 on HR and you've confirmed that
I was wrong
I was wrong
I don't know if I was wrong about that one. Stanley isn't good at Park is gone. Kempt is better than both obviously
Who says you have to take a kid each year but its really dumb not to focus on instate kids?
And convenient you left Wieskamp off the list. If you were able to keep most of Jok, Bohannon, Connor, Patrick, Wieskamp, Green, Carton and Foster home in a roughly 8 year time period that is a pretty good start on recruiting.
I know it's your schtick but try to be objective. The kid just threw 26 TD to only 6 INTThat's not trolling at all. Kempt was statistically quite a bit better than Stanley and Stanley's QBR would have been MUCH worse if it included his 7 fumbles
I know it's your schtick but try to be objective. The kid just threw 26 TD to only 6 INT
And with Iowa's offensive scheme and lack of quality WR, those numbers are pretty impressive.I know it's your schtick but try to be objective. The kid just threw 26 TD to only 6 INT
Kempt had a great year, as did Stanley.And 7 fumbles plus Kempt had better stats anyways
And with Iowa's offensive scheme and lack of quality WR, those numbers are pretty impressive.
You predicted 13-5 on HR and you've confirmed that
I was wrong
I was wrong
I don't know if I was wrong about that one. Stanley isn't good at Park is gone. Kempt is better than both obviously
Link to me confirming I predicted 13-5 on HR? That didnt happen. Gosh you get so mad sometimes.
I stopped it at 2017, so I didn't conveniently leave anyone off. I'm talking about the last 5 years.
As for your list, Jok couldn't come here due to Lefty; Connor, Patrick, Weiskamp and Green were never coming here either. Otherwise, Iowa State is still actively recruiting Weiskamp and Carton, but maybe prioritizing them they way Iowa is. So 2 kids in the past 6 years that were highly rated enough to come to Iowa State and weren't otherwise linked to another in-state school.
Time and resources are finite. So I'm fine with Prohm making inroads in Chicago, Milwaukee and prep schools like Oak Hill. Those are areas that produce division one talent every year. My guess is there probably isn't a handful more elite prospects coming out of Osky and Bettendorf.
So I'm completely fine with Prohm making an attempt at those guys, but also focusing his recruiting efforts on more prosperous recruiting grounds. But if you think it's important to throw all your eggs into the "Iowa kid" basket, well then you should be pretty thrilled with the results you're seeing at U of I.
If you're not Dan on HR (which we all know you are) what is your user name over there? That's you confirming it
Prohm isn't ignoring elite instate talent. That is just an troll statement.
He isnt making elite instate talent a priority either, according to @CyTwins