Teams
Forum List
Toggle sidebar

Iowa Football Recruiting

YeahBuddy said:
Only an ISU fan would consider tying for second in a division an accomplishment worth mentioning.

This program still yearns for the McCarney days. Thanks JP!!
Click to expand...

Amazing. You pulled it off. Basic rhetoric from Hawkdom.

The conversation has nothing to do with Iowa State, nor that 2nd in a division is an accomplishment. Nebraska has not been 'Nebraska' good for a long time. They've been more 'Iowa' good. There's this odd premise that Nebraska's greatness can't hack it since they've joined the Big 14, when they weren't great prior.

They've won 5, 6, or 7 games in conference several times regardless of conference but have not been impressive in doing so. There's not much difference between 5-3 and 6-2. Is that difficult?
 
madguy30 said:
Amazing. You pulled it off. Basic rhetoric from Hawkdom.

The conversation has nothing to do with Iowa State, nor that 2nd in a division is an accomplishment. Nebraska has not been 'Nebraska' good for a long time. They've been more 'Iowa' good. There's this odd premise that Nebraska's greatness can't hack it since they've joined the Big 14, when they weren't great prior.

They've won 5, 6, or 7 games in conference several times regardless of conference but have not been impressive in doing so. There's not much difference between 5-3 and 6-2. Is that difficult?
Click to expand...

I guess it is just funny that an ISU fan would call averaging over 8 wins a year for the last 15 years is "marginal". That is being a good program, and you just don't get it. No, they certainly aren't the Nebraska of old, but they certainly aren't "marginal".
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Rural
HawkeyeMashup said:
I guess it is just funny that an ISU fan would call averaging over 8 wins a year for the last 15 years is "marginal". That is being a good program, and you just don't get it. No, they certainly aren't the Nebraska of old, but they certainly aren't "marginal".
Click to expand...

Again, speaking as a college football fan. ISU's football program has nothing to do with it.

I'll go with 'somewhat decent', nothing memorable though.

I WILL leave it to Iowa fans to continue to stick up for Nebraska football though. Good luck with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyTwins
CyTwins said:
Iowa has one top 25 finish in the last 7 years so yes the one year they finished in the top 25 they are counted towards it
Click to expand...

Still don't get the whole ranking concept do you? It wasn't a top 25 season it was a top 10 season.

Leave it to an isu fan to not know the difference
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Rural
MVCchamps said:
Still don't get the whole ranking concept do you? It wasn't a top 25 season it was a top 10 season.

Leave it to an isu fan to not know the difference
Click to expand...

Iowa has finished in the AP Top 25 one time in the last seven years. That is a fact so I'm not sure why you'd even argue it
 
madguy30 said:
Again, speaking as a college football fan. ISU's football program has nothing to do with it.

I'll go with 'somewhat decent', nothing memorable though.

I WILL leave it to Iowa fans to continue to stick up for Nebraska football though. Good luck with that.
Click to expand...

When you are around the 20th best winning% of all P5 teams over the last 15 years that is hardly "marginal". They are certainly delusional and arrogant fan base. They still think they are an elite program and they aren't close to that. They certainly aren't marginal either, and saying they are marginal is every bit as stupid as Nebraska fan saying they are Elite.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Rural
CyTwins said:
Iowa fans sticking up for Nebraska is exactly why it's a trophy rivalry and not a real rivalry
Click to expand...

If you think Nebraska is Marginal over the last 15 years, you must think KState is bad. Nebraska has more wins that KState over the last 15 years.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Rural
MVCchamps said:
Can't evaluated talent, understand what a top ten season is for football nope with Cy Twins I think is all gif, myth and derp.

A lot like isu, no real substance just puff.
Click to expand...

What I said was accurate. Why can't I evaluate talent? I'm right 95% of the time
 
CyTwins said:
I have 24,000 posts and Hawkeye fans can name like 3 things I've been wrong about so actually I was way off. I'm right about 99.9% of the time
Click to expand...

Then prove to us that all 24,000 posts were 99.9%. I will hang up and watch.
 
HawkeyeMashup said:
You don't evaluate talent in every one of your posts. Now if you wanna say you are trolling in 99.9% of your post I would agree with that.
Click to expand...

Well you tell me how many posts you think I have that evaluate talent? I would say at least 10% and that's probably on the low end. A few times being wrong out of 2,400 evaluations is why most people think I'm elite at evaluating talent
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Help Support Us

Become a patron
Top Bottom
Back