Seemingly never ending Iowa MBB thread (still going.....)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm guessing Fran has never had a team at Iowa with 5 double digits scorers. Moss sucks by the way, no clue why you Hawkeye fans think he'll be good. If that's your starting 5 next year....yikes

Then you are accepting my bet?

Oh it sounds like you claimed Jok sucked as well and that Warren > Wadley. Let's just say you either try to troll Hawk fans too much, or can't judge talent.
 
I'm guessing Fran has never had a team at Iowa with 5 double digits scorers. Moss sucks by the way, no clue why you Hawkeye fans think he'll be good. If that's your starting 5 next year....yikes

I could say the same thing about Babb.
 
Then you are accepting my bet?

Oh it sounds like you claimed Jok sucked as well and that Warren > Wadley. Let's just say you either try to troll Hawk fans too much, or can't judge talent.

I will try to find one of my Hawkeye buddies to bet that Iowa won't have 5 double digit scorers, not some random message board poster that will be banned before it comes around
 
The top of the SEC and Pac 12 was better than the Big Ten. Has a major conference ever had a year without a top 3 seed?

Big 12 in 1999. And more recently pac 12 when their conference champ was sent off to the nit.
 
I will try to find one of my Hawkeye buddies to bet that Iowa won't have 5 double digit scorers, not some random message board poster that will be banned before it comes around

LOL, there is no way a Hawkeye fan would be friends with you IRL.
 
And the Big 12 was better than the Big Ten. Enjoy the NIT!

Well I didn't know that the BigTen was that much better head to head. Wow, that is pretty bad. Can someone confirm the BigTen was 7-3 vs Big12? Surely that was because Purdue/Minnesota beat the bottom of the Big12, right?
 
In order, and not really even debatable.

ACC, Big East, Big12, BigTen, SEC/Pac12

How is the top of the Big East better than the top of the Big 12? Their seeds go 1, 4, 6, and their 3rd place team is in the PIG. The Big 12 had 1, 3, 4, 5 in their top 4. And even if you're talking about overall conference strength, even though the post you responded to was talking about the tops of the conferences, LOL at the Big East after those three. Having four teams in the 8/9 game or worse does not a strong conference make.
 
I agree the top of the Big12 was better. Not as good as the ACC or Big East, but better than the BigTen

The Big 12 finished 2nd in RPI, not the Big East. The top 4 of the Big 12 are significantly better than the top 4 in the Big East and its not really close. Really bad arguments on both points.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron