I was just pointing out a fact. He's not a top 40 recruit
He still has a year left also, so he could go higher or lower.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was just pointing out a fact. He's not a top 40 recruit
So you might get 1 good player. But you still don't have a point guard. Just a bunch of dudes clogging up the lane and nonathletic guardsWieskamp is pretty damn good dude. Top 40 player in the country. If he was going to Iowa State you wouldn't be saying what you are saying about him.
I was just pointing out a fact. He's not a top 40 recruit
So when you point out a fact like this it is allowed, but when I point out a fact that Fran has made it to three straight NCAA tourney's it doesn't count?
Weiskamp actually has the exact same composite ranking as Wiggington, I dont know how any ISU fan wouldnt want the kid.
So when you point out a fact like this it is allowed, but when I point out a fact that Fran has made it to three straight NCAA tourney's it doesn't count?
I know Wisconsin fans are pretty mad about the robbery last night
This is why this thread is so long. It's like the special ed class hok fans have to stay in high school until they are old enough to drink.
http://247sports.com/Season/2018-Basketball/CompositeRecruitRankings?InstitutionGroup=HighSchool
Actually it appears Iowa got robbed on the Flagrant 1 that was called against Jok.
"When there is a foul called for contact, the officials, with a plausible reason, may review the severity of the foul during the dead ball period following the call. When the ball becomes live, there shall be no review of the made call."
So they should not have been able to review the play after Jok shot his first free throw.
This was on Facebook so if this isn't the actual definition of the rule then its not my fault.
The younger McCaffrey could end up being a top 50 recruit. Garza looks like a pretty good recruit and had some big time offers. McCaffrey and Nunge are wildcards, don't really know until they play at that level. I agree, a PG that could create more off the dribble would obviously make Iowa a lot better.So you might get 1 good player. But you still don't have a point guard. Just a bunch of dudes clogging up the lane and nonathletic guards
The younger McCaffrey could end up being a top 50 recruit. Garza looks like a pretty good recruit and had some big time offers. McCaffrey and Nunge are wildcards, don't really know until they play at that level. I agree, a PG that could create more off the dribble would obviously make Iowa a lot better.
With that said, your eye for talent isn't very good at all. I would much rather trust recruiting sites than you when it comes to evaluating talent.
Everyone would take him but we wouldn't be calling him a Top 40 kid because he's not top 40. He's been dropping like a rock he was up to 18 at one point.
What isnt?
Not trolling, but could you please elaborate?That's not correct
Weiskamp actually has the exact same composite ranking as Wiggington, I dont know how any ISU fan wouldnt want the kid.
I'm going with lower considering he's already dropped over 20 spots.He still has a year left also, so he could go higher or lower.
The younger McCaffrey could end up being a top 50 recruit.