I don't know. I didn't recruit and create the roster. Go ask Fran.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know. I didn't recruit and create the roster. Go ask Fran.
Worse than Prohm?
I wasn't torturing myself at all. Sorry my interests don't match up exactly with yours?Well, I'm sorry that you like to torture yourself. I'm not sure what your reply has to do with my argument at all, but you do you.
I know a lot more goes into what makes which conference better. I was just stating that it was interesting.
It also doesn't help the Big 12 that they have two teams almost on Rutgers level according to the RPI. That means the other eight Big 12 teams get at least four games against pretty much a Rutgers level team.
I have no issues admitting I posted that. Thats how I felt back then when Drake was taking us down to the wire and we hadnt beaten a good team in a whole calendar year.
I'll give him props for rallying the team together and giving Solomon a chance. Im not sure we wouldnt be on the bubble right now had he not played him.
The top 4 in the Big 12 all have a shot to make the Finial 4. Depends on match-ups. The ACC has a lot of good teams too so nothing is guaranteed, but teams from those 2 conferences is who I will be betting on. Nova' of course is another team to watch.It seems like I have heard this in past years and it never comes to fruition.
Isn't time to close this god awful thread?
I don't know. I didn't recruit and create the roster. Go ask Fran.
What do you mean Cherry Pick? Those are Indiana's 2 best wins, and the main reason they are under 100 in the RPI. The wins count, that is why they came into Big 10 play so highly rated in the RPI. I guess, I don't understand your point about the 2 wins.I think it is to an extent. But, those wins count too, you can't just take away two wins they have and cherry pick that out. If you're gonna do that, you have to do that for every team.
Who knows. But, from what I've seen all three teams are garbage.Except I think everyone on here would agree Texas and Oklahoma would smoke Rutgers.
That was actually a month ago
Well, you could also say, their RPI was so high, then they started playing in the Big Ten and losing which makes the Big Ten look good, because every team in the Big Ten is beating the team who beat KU and UNC. It could go both ways, I lean towards your side though.What do you mean Cherry Pick? Those are Indiana's 2 best wins, and the main reason they are under 100 in the RPI. The wins count, that is why they came into Big 10 play so highly rated in the RPI. I guess, I don't understand your point about the 2 wins.
Oh yeah, after we just lost to West Virginia at home. I still stand by what I said then, 28 other posters on that exact thread felt the same way after that dumpster fire of a game.
I'm surprised there weren't more morons like you that overreact over one game
That was the point I was making haha. The reason Indiana, even though they are 93 in the RPI, has not hurt the B1G is because they came in so high and all of those teams beat them, bumping the other teams RPI, while Indiana's was dropping.Well, you could also say, their RPI was so high, then they started playing in the Big Ten and losing which makes the Big Ten look good, because every team in the Big Ten is beating the team who beat KU and UNC. It could go both ways, I lean towards your side though.
They also lost two to transfer.I don't have access to Fran, I just keep hearing how young Iowa is this year but the only lost 4 seniors so I'm confused
Pretty sure I already did this for you when you asked a few weeks ago, most likely in this very thread.
Feel free to go back and look for it.