It remains to be seen, but it is what ISU should have been doing for the last 10 years. If ISU had early season line play, they'd have a 50/50 chance to beat Iowa every season. But at this point I don't see any way they'd be a better team at the end of the year, notwithstanding an early season win over Iowa. That's probably going to change on a semi regular basis going forward, but that isn't the case now.
I hold the belief that if ISU had concentrated on developing in state recruits for offensive line play and ran the ball, they should have been no worse than .500 for the last decade. Historically if you look at the B12's OOC and records against T25 going .500 given the overall lack of defense was/is obtainable.
Iowa played 5 T25 last season, ISU played 3. the B12 had two teams over .500 against T25, and one was Texas. The B1G had 3, but head to head the B1G played more T25 games. Obviously there are more teams. I looked this up quicly as well as some head to head games. It is what it is.
Your point about a tougher schedule for ISU lacks factual basis in the last several seasons. Having said this, given the easier schedule and overall ease of beating a B12 teams with a running and ball control offense, there is no reason your new staff should have ISU @ .500 by year 3.
Um history shows that Iowa State DOES have a 50/50 shot to beat Iowa every year but thanks for playing.