****Official Class of 2017 Recruiting Thread****

If we get one of the two true point guards I'll be ecstatic. If we get one of the combo guards I'll still be happy but a little nervous. I know Prohm will have a year to develop the cg into a pg and it should work. If it doesn't completely work, I don't see a forward like Niang or Royce White that we can run the offense through in a pinch (maybe Feazell or Lewis can learn this). Overall, this is a darn, good start.
 
It's great that we've filled spots in the front court with high quality players, and have a remaining need in an area that most of us consider our strongest recruiting selling point (Prohm's experience turning point guards into pros).

That was my thinking as well. Excited we got these two guys but my expectation is that we would get one of these big-time point guards given that its coaches strong suit, our history with point guards, and that we have a very obvious need.
I'm assuming lard is not coming so wouldn't surprise me if we got a point guard and another guard at the high school level and two junior college guys. But who knows
 
If we get one of the two true point guards I'll be ecstatic. If we get one of the combo guards I'll still be happy but a little nervous. I know Prohm will have a year to develop the cg into a pg and it should work. If it doesn't completely work, I don't see a forward like Niang or Royce White that we can run the offense through in a pinch (maybe Feazell or Lewis can learn this). Overall, this is a darn, good start.

If he doesn't land Wiggington or Sexton, I think we go juco or grad transfer for PG. A good transfer PG with NBA aspirations would be hard pressed to find a better situation than a successful program, in the best league in the country lead by a coach who (by then) will have sent 3 PG's to the NBA. My preference would be to get one of the PG's, one SG and then add juco or grad guys next spring. I am leery of more than 4 HS kids, mainly because I would like to see the classes a bit more balanced but also, its tough to see there being enough playing time to keep 5 or 6 kids here the next 4 years.
 
I'd still take Aamir Simms to go along with that PG and SG, if we signed 5 high schoolers this class, it's not like all will stay 4 years.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyke


No more information, just said that. I assume that means he will be releasing his list soon. If I had to guess, I would think this isn't good for Iowa St's chances since we just landed KeyShawn yesterday. I guess we will see though.
 
Last edited:
If he doesn't land Wiggington or Sexton, I think we go juco or grad transfer for PG. A good transfer PG with NBA aspirations would be hard pressed to find a better situation than a successful program, in the best league in the country lead by a coach who (by then) will have sent 3 PG's to the NBA. My preference would be to get one of the PG's, one SG and then add juco or grad guys next spring. I am leery of more than 4 HS kids, mainly because I would like to see the classes a bit more balanced but also, its tough to see there being enough playing time to keep 5 or 6 kids here the next 4 years.

We can't forget about Jackson. If we go juco or transfer, I'd like to have a 3 year guy, because Donovan will be our guy next year.
 
Read that we may sign 4 or 5 high school kids now and are less likely to go juco. Not a lot of juco bigs that they like. The one juco wing other than that we may not be interested. Still will keep one open for a transfer though.

If they keep getting their targets, I'm all for them signing 4-5 HS guys! Balancing classes is nice, but if you're getting HS players you really want, I won't complain.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: mfelske and CyTwins
We can't forget about Jackson. If we go juco or transfer, I'd like to have a 3 year guy, because Donovan will be our guy next year.

Hoping he's our guy but that's putting the program on him without seeing him play, whether it's HS or JUCO we need a 2nd option. Perennial top 25 team and 3 NBA PG's and #16 '17 class and playing time available will help. Only thing we are missing is blue blood status.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Doc
I don't think Feazell counts ISU out for Sims but who knows. They lose most of their bigs so there is plenty of playing time. Especially since it looks like Lard is a no-show
 
I don't think Feazell counts ISU out for Sims but who knows. They lose most of their bigs so there is plenty of playing time. Especially since it looks like Lard is a no-show

They're very similar players, I wouldn't be surprised either way
 
First off, who goes from a top 6 to a top 5? Is he going to do a count down by ones every couple of weeks?

But I do think this will bump us out. Feazell and Simms are both stretch 4 types, that we used the Niang comparison with.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: srjclone
First off, who goes from a top 6 to a top 5? Is he going to do a count down by ones every couple of weeks?

But I do think this will bump us out. Feazell and Simms are both stretch 4 types, that we used the Niang comparison with.
Cutting down to 5 isn't that odd to me just considering that's how many officials they get to take. Having a top 6 doesn't make a lot of sense unless he's planning on taking an unofficial to a closer school.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cydkar
First off, who goes from a top 6 to a top 5? Is he going to do a count down by ones every couple of weeks?

But I do think this will bump us out. Feazell and Simms are both stretch 4 types, that we used the Niang comparison with.

Have to say though.....I've been following basketball for over thirty years, and I've only seen one Georges Niang.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron