When you play better teams you're going to have more losses, you can get your two tough games out of the way in October in the b1g and then go on a tear against sub .500 teams, the polls don't care who you beat as long as you win.
Iowa Football Recruiting
- Thread starter CyTexMex
- Start date
When you play better teams you're going to have more losses, you can get your two tough games out of the way in October in the b1g and then go on a tear against sub .500 teams, the polls don't care who you beat as long as you win.
So the big 12 has been better but now you just think it'll get worse. Got it
Last edited:
Wrong again. Twins you need a little help. The Big 10 has been better by the numbers and the chasm is only going to escalate. That was the point. My God, if it were not an easy route for Oklahoma and Texas (when they don't suck) they would be long gone. Are u not smart? Oklahoma gets pissed about the lack of a championship game and Bowlsby starts sniffing around embarrassing schools to join. Wrong thread, but if you think the Big 12 will be around in 5 years I want what you are smoking.
What numbers are you talking about? Sagarin.com had the Big 12 better last year in their conference power rankings.
I wish there was a Big12 vs Big10 challenge lol. Maybe if we add 4 more teams. I'm too lazy to do the research but bowl season usually gives a good idea about conference strength and is why the SEC has its rep. Overall record, BCS success, big12vbig10 H2H would be interesting
And every other ranking had the Big 10 better. Sagarin? My gosh, that is just stupid. Is that the same computer print out from Jeff Sagarin that had Alabama ranked in front of Ole Miss last year after Ole Miss beat Alabama? The same ranking that had Ohio St in front of Mich St after Mich St won in Columbus? Ok. Come on Twins I know you are better.
Bama and OSU were both better teams than Ole Miss and MSU
No I just don't trust anything you say
But you're sourcing Bleacher Report which has way less credibility than Sagarin
I know Bama and arguably OSU were better than Miss and MSU respectively. My point was the spurious nature of the Sagarin rankings that Twins relies on for his argument. I'll roll out OSU, Michigan, MSU, Iowa, Wisconsin, Nebraska, and Penn St. Who you got? Oklahoma and who? TCU and Okie St maybe? Then what? Texas and KSU? West Virginia and Texas Tech? Not even a fair fight guys.
What rankings had the Big Ten as a better conference last year? I already cited a credible one
And again Twins stack up with the teams I put out. A joke. You have 1 elite team. 1. Ohio St, Michigan, MSU, Wisc, Iowa, Nebbie, and Penn St. Really?