Coaching Search Rumors - Consolidated Thread

I'd give a phone call to at least these guys

Phil Montgomery
Matt Campbell
Todd Monken
Dino Babers
Scott Frost

Of course, you would call those 5 guys and you would offer them big money. But in the end, I'm guessing those 5 guys will laugh in your face and say I'm either staying where I am (and making good money) or I'll hold out for a much better job.

Again, the reality is that we are likely looking at a low level coordinator or a Power 5 position coach. Or maybe an FCS head coach.

But it is fun to dream.
 
He is on contract until 2021.

He's also making <$400K/year, with a $320K buyout. Very easy to manage and easy to entice him to ISU. I am NOT endorsing him, but his current contract and salary are NO obstacle at all.
 
Jim Walden ran the triple option!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You guys are freaking funny.
 
IIRC KU had some decent candidates in their pool. But they choose to go with the guy who showed the most......passion.
 
Of course, you would call those 5 guys and you would offer them big money. But in the end, I'm guessing those 5 guys will laugh in your face and say I'm either staying where I am (and making good money) or I'll hold out for a much better job.

Again, the reality is that we are likely looking at a low level coordinator or a Power 5 position coach. Or maybe an FCS head coach.

But it is fun to dream.

We will offer to double or even quadruple their current salaries. They'll listen.
 
Oh here we go. Cant wait to hear your reasoning.

That would be great. However, he's already making $1.7 mil at Navy, so we would have to pay more than what we were paying Rhoads to get him.

If they want this style at more of a discount, then keep an eye on Troy Calhoun from Air Force

Reason number 1. He also likes Navy, basically said it will take a giant offer to get him to think about leaving and will get better offers if he wants to leave.
 
Don't know anything about the Navy guy at all. One thing I will say though, is he is used to dealing with self-motivated players. May not work with "talented" guys as well. Could be a replay of the McDermott movie in that aspect.

My first "insight" would be: get a guy who has been successful as a head coach somewhere. They have proved something. Not all the winners at small schools will be winners at big schools, its no sure thing. But to me that is a better chance than someone who was a coordinator and has not been a head coach. Plus after Chizek and Rhoads, I have coordinator fatigue right now.

My other "insight" would be get someone "SMART". I really liked Rhoads & Mac both, and they knew football, but neither struck me as a super genius. Briles, Saban, Meyer - they are not just FB coaches, they strike me as guys who are quite intelligent and would be successful in any profession. JP, follow the old rule for hiring - hire people smarter than you and they will make you look good.
 
Matt Wells from Utah State could be interesting. His brother Luke was on Rhoads' staff here for a while.

He is in his third year as HC and has gone 9-5, 10-4, and now 6-5. Of course you'd prefer a guy with more of an upward trajectory but I don't know enough about USU football to know why they are on a bit of a downswing.
 
CW just tweeted a bit ago that he heard a few months back that Scott Frost would have interest in the job. Said the source wasnt very stable tho
 
Last edited:
CW just tweeted a bit ago that he heard a few months back that Scott Frost would have interest in the job. Said the source was very stable tho

I would honestly be happy with a hire like Scott Frost, even if he was here for 2-3 years before going to Nebraska, if that meant that he stocked the cupboard with talent and went 8-5 or something in his last season. Hopefully that could springboard us to the next hire.
 
Not a sexy pick but I think Todd sturdy might be a good option and here's why. We could get him cheap and with a shorter contract. Players seem to like him and we would have a shot keeping all the young talent that this team does have. The roster is actually set up good for the future. Getting a whole new system could cause us to waste a talent like lanning. I honestly think the best offense we could run is what we were doing the last couple of weeks. We didn't win but it is easy to forget that we should have beat the number 5 ranked team and KSU on the road in back to back weeks because of the offense we were running....now proceed to say I am crazy...

Football is not basketball. Players aren't going to transfer out en masse because of a coaching switch.
 
Very different IMO. First of all everything is completely different compared to the spread and you only get one week to prep for it. How many teams in the Big 12 run some variation of the spread? Most of them do.

Big 12 defenses are built to stop a more finesse type game, the spread would be a lot more power. Those hybrid nickel/lb guys would (should) be destroyed with that scheme.

For the most part Big 12 DL's are smaller and quicker, depending on how things go, could be tough for them to handle all those runs destroying them throughout the game.

I am not saying go with the option for sure though.

The problem is a lot of triple option football isn't power, it's finesse. You are essentially doing the same things and challenging defenses in the same way. Defending an option attack has a lot to do with eye discipline and I just believe that B12 defenses have to have that the way it is. The military academies run these systems because they have a lot of 280-290 lb linemen due to other military standards so they can't just line up and run it down your throat.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron