Dear America - Iowa Doesn't Care What You Think

If they're not ranked right now it doesn't count. If they sneak back in the poll at the end of the season it will count. Hawkeye fans wrote the rules on this when we've beat ranked teams in the past.
Unfortunately they were written in crayon so they're a little hard to decipher....
 
You're talking about games that haven't occurred. Iowa has already proved themselves by beating everyone on 35th ranked SOS. 2 ranked teams on the road, 1 ranked team after we played - all 3 of those teams have only lost to ranked teams and have beaten numerous ranked teams themselves.

Neither of those teams will be ranked at the regular season. Nor will Pitt most likely. As carvers4math said, Pit hasn't beaten a team with a winning record.

Again, this schedule isn't Iowa's fault. But when we look back on it at the end of the year, they will be penalized for it. And rightfully so.
 
Wow that was embarrassing even for Miller

I bet it was a coincidence he wrote it now, right before Iowa's SOS will nose dive while all of the teams he mentioned will increase.

Again, Iowa has done everything they can but they should and will get penalized for a brutally bad schedule at the end of the year.
 
Iowa played two power five conference teams OOC, Baylor hasn't played a power five conference team OOC since 2009. Also, no one takes Iowa seriously as a playoff contender. Baylor is a very legit playoff contender and has a been an elite team for a while but has done nothing to improve their schedule. Baylor still doesn't have a big time OOC win during this run they've been on for the last several years, I'm certain that holds them back in the eyes of some voters.

Which is a bogus complaint when Baylor plays one more conference game in a tougher conference than Iowa faces. When you have no SOS in your conference schedule and you get one extra game to schedule OOC games, of course youre going to have more P5 games there.
 
attachment.php

Their schedule would have really been cake if they didn't have to go to Lincoln.
 
Auburn, USC, Oregon and Georgia were all pre-season Top 10. Only Georgia is still in the coaches top 25 as the 25th team. Do you think wins against those guys early in the season still mean the same at the end of the season?

No, but it's not like NW or Wisconsin are falling apart. They've only lost to ranked teams and will both be back in the polls.
 
No, but it's not like NW or Wisconsin are falling apart. They've only lost to ranked teams and will both be back in the polls.

Want to bet? No way Northwestern ends up in the Top 25. Zero chance. Wisconsin has an outside chance but their remaining schedule is brutally awful too. No more chances for signature wins.

Wisconsin's wins are Miami-OH, Troy, Hawaii, Nebraska, and Purdue...not exactly Top 25 worthy.
 
Soooo when they say W's against ranked opponents it can go down? NO. I've never seen that graphic or statistic being used. W's against ranked opponents are exactly that, ranked opponents. That number can go up if you beat more ranked teams, it cannot go down. Iowa didn't beat a ranked team in Pitt, they beat an unranked Pitt team which is currently ranked. Iowa is 2-0 against ranked teams.

Isn't the article whining about a perception problem when reality, as decided by current strength of schedule, doesn't support the perception?

Media reaction and the polls (AP, Coaches, and playoff committee) are dependent on perception. Your using an arbitrary statistic that has no bearing on the perception or actual rank of your team. Is "wins against ranked teams" a stat used to determine poll position? Or is it perception?

When I say "get credit for," I mean that Iowa fans think that a win against No. 19 Wisconsin in Week 5 should hold the same weight all season, no matter how Wisconsin fares the rest of the season. Do you think that is an accurate line of thought?
 
Which is a bogus complaint when Baylor plays one more conference game in a tougher conference than Iowa faces. When you have no SOS in your conference schedule and you get one extra game to schedule OOC games, of course youre going to have more P5 games there.

Iowa and Baylor are on different levels. Criticizing Baylor's schedule is not a bogus complaint in terms of them making the playoffs. Playing a nine game conference schedule hasn't stopped Texas or OU from scheduling quality non-conference games. TCU has been able to play power five teams out of conference. If Baylor's terrible non-conf schedule leads to them getting left out of the playoff with a single loss again, it's their own fault.
 
At least Pitt still has Duke and Notre Dame on their schedule to test whether they are any good before they would potentially play in conference title game against probably Florida State or Clemson. Iowa really doesn't have much until a conference title game.
 
That article is ******* terrible. Stop complaining.

Bottom line, if Iowa goes 13-0, they're in the playoffs because they'll get their signature win in the CCG. The odds of four other P5 conferences having undefeated champions are slim - pretty good chance 13-0 automatically puts Iowa in the playoff. Iowa controls it's own destiny, no reason to ***** about it.

That being said, they'll undoubtedly drop one they shouldn't like they do every year - my money is on an 11-1 finish with a loss @ Indiana. Which will make that article look even more pointless.

Iowa won't beat tOSU if Urban finally pulls his head out of his *** and ends the Cardale Jones experiment. They'll keep it a hell of a lot closer than Wiscy did last season, but they'll still lose by 10ish if they play tOSU. I think Iowa would beat MSU or Michigan, but doubt either makes it to the CCG.
 
Im not.

I give Iowa credit, they are getting the wins, regardless of schedule. We struggle to beat the teams we should. Do I think Iowa should get in the playoffs? Hell no, but I will give credit to their wins and they will go bowling.
I agree, we don't beat, Pitt or Wisconsin (though they barely did either) and we lost to Iowa so 4-3 at best. I think we would have beat Ill. St., N.tex, Ill. and NW but who knows.
 
Beginning of the year:

"FIRE Kirk. Program is dead. Sick of boring bowl games, boring offense. Gameday atmosphere sucks. Even if we win a lot of games our schedule is lousy."


Now:

"Kirk will get coach of the year! We're a contender. We deserve to be in the playoff. We beat 2 ranked teams! (even if neither is ranked at the end of the year)."
 
Here is the most clear cut and easy way to look at it:


If you're tied with ISU into the 4th, you probably aren't that good.
 
Iowa fans just need to understand and come to terms with why nobody cares about them. You're undefeated, enjoy it instead of whining and screaming LOOK AT ME
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron