Nice strawman.Good thing Iowa State use to dominate the Big 12 North so they should be prepared to do the same in the Big Ten West.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nice strawman.Good thing Iowa State use to dominate the Big 12 North so they should be prepared to do the same in the Big Ten West.
Minnesota gave a much healthier TCU a better game than ISU.
ISU might win 1 or 2 more, might...
Really? ISU would be torn apart by the B1G. ISU is like a Rutgers. Mediocre at best, will compete for a solid half then fall apart by end of the 3rd quarter.
Minnesota gave a much healthier TCU a better game than ISU.
ISU might win 1 or 2 more, might...
Rutgers did just beat the best team left on Iowa's schedule
The argument isn't or shouldn't be about this year's team. There is no doubt that Iowa State would benefit as a program from not having to compete with every southern Big 12 team for southern recruits. Recruiting against Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, etc. is much easier than Texas, Baylor, OU, etc.
The style of play of the Big 12 maximizes the talent differential between top tier and low tier teams. The Big 10 style of football lets less talented teams hang around and steal games.
As we've seen in the Big 10's draft numbers, its QB play has been awful for 20 years. I doubt that's because the Big 10 defenses are just so stout. While there is some legs to that argument, it's more likely that the QBs in that league are average to below average when compared to the rest of the country.
Iowa State would fit in nicely in the Big 10 west. We wouldn't win it, and we probably wouldn't go to a bowl every season, but it would be a hell of a lot easier than playing a 9-game conference schedule against the best the Big 12 has to offer. I don't think that's really up for debate.
Who is the fastest team iowa plays each year? I honestly can't think of a "fast" team on Iowa schedule. The BigXII on the other hand is incredibly fast, both in skill position players and in tempo.
The Big Ten has about 6 teams similar to ISU's level at the bottom, some a little better, some possibly even worse. Then there are about 8 teams ranging from somewhat better than ISU to drastically better than ISU. You play 8 of the 13 possible opponents and dodge 5. Within that there's the possibility for a schedule we can get some Ws or a schedule where we still get hammered almost every week. The only way a B10W schedule could compare to B12 is if it includes MSU/Mich/OSU as the two cross division teams this year and they schedule 2 P5 non conf games.
The Big 12 has one team that is probably the worst P5 team and 8 teams that are clearly better than ISU this year. You play 9 of 9 possible.
Obviously these things change year to year, but there's simply no comparing our 2015 schedule possibilities to a schedule like Iowa's where the top 3/4 teams are rotated off. It wouldn't make us "good", but it's so obviously more manageable.
Who is the fastest team iowa plays each year? I honestly can't think of a "fast" team on Iowa schedule. The BigXII on the other hand is incredibly fast, both in skill position players and in tempo.
Do you sit at home with a stopwatch when you watch these games on TV?
Iowa has beaten and competed well against plenty of SEC teams in bowl games over the years. This whole "slow/fast" thing is such a ridiculous myth. Ohio State is probably the fastest team in the country, or at least they were last year. Ask Baylor how fast Michigan State is.
Real football is about blocking, tackling, and the line of scrimmage, anyway. Otherwise, let's just put everybody in shorts and run shuttle relays for 3 hours. Would probably cut down on the injuries that way.
Do you sit at home with a stopwatch when you watch these games on TV?
Iowa has beaten and competed well against plenty of SEC teams in bowl games over the years. This whole "slow/fast" thing is such a ridiculous myth. Ohio State is probably the fastest team in the country, or at least they were last year. Ask Baylor how fast Michigan State is.
Real football is about blocking, tackling, and the line of scrimmage, anyway. Otherwise, let's just put everybody in shorts and run shuttle relays for 3 hours. Would probably cut down on the injuries that way.
The biggest problem I see is wearing down. ISU isn't built to withstand the daunting B1G big bodies week in and week out. We'd be destroyed as the season went on. We can hold up but we'll ultimately fail and die. I don't see ISU beating Nebraska, nor Iowa, nor Illinois, nor Wisconsin, maybe Minnesota. NW? No. We'd be the bottom of the B1G West. Our coach is terrible. B1G east? We'd be torched.
Did you watch the Iowa-Tennessee game last year?
But South Carolina and Florida were really bad those years...(rolls eyes)Sure did. You do realize that Iowa sucked last year, right?
Did you happen to catch Iowa beating the **** out of Florida or South Carolina in previous bowl games? How about that last second win over a Saban-coached LSU team, or the year we got screwed against Urban's first Florida team?
Yep, sure were huge speed differentials in those games. I just saw a blur on my TV screen when I watched them.
Do you sit at home with a stopwatch when you watch these games on TV?
Iowa has beaten and competed well against plenty of SEC teams in bowl games over the years. This whole "slow/fast" thing is such a ridiculous myth. Ohio State is probably the fastest team in the country, or at least they were last year. Ask Baylor how fast Michigan State is.
Real football is about blocking, tackling, and the line of scrimmage, anyway. Otherwise, let's just put everybody in shorts and run shuttle relays for 3 hours. Would probably cut down on the injuries that way.