Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just curious if anyone has seen anything explaining how staying in the ACC will benefit FSU? Anybody seen ACC bloggers making a case for FSU to stay recently? Also, does FSU have a timeline?
Just curious if anyone has seen anything explaining how staying in the ACC will benefit FSU? Anybody seen ACC bloggers making a case for FSU to stay recently? Also, does FSU have a timeline?
Pro FSU staying in the ACC folks hang their hat on three things:
1.) ACC will rise again in FB and will not be left out of the playoff moving forward
2.) Geographic rivals are in ACC and academic climate is much better
3.) There is still nothing proven with respect to Big 12 financial benefit compared to the ACC. Until this is shown and documented by real sources then there is no reason to consider a move
I didn't know this. I guess I thought that the B12 TV deal was better than the ACC deal? Also, I thought that a move to the B12 would allow FSU to get more for their 2nd & 3rd tier rights? I must be misunderstanding the financial argument.
Pro FSU staying in the ACC folks hang their hat on three things:
1.) ACC will rise again in FB and will not be left out of the playoff moving forward
2.) Geographic rivals are in ACC and academic climate is much better
3.) There is still nothing proven with respect to Big 12 financial benefit compared to the ACC. Until this is shown and documented by real sources then there is no reason to consider a move
Final details of the new Tier 1 is still speculative. Contract hasn't been signed. Also, nothing concrete on Tier 3 value for FSU (at least that has been released). The result is estimates and speculation that cannot be proven, but is highly likely a close estimate. It leaves rooms for doubters to say where is the proof though.
It’s now apparent (to me anyway) why a possible 20 million dollars in Big East exit fees & lawsuits couldn’t dissuade West Virginia from anxiously joining the big 12 in 2012. It wouldn’t surprise grandma if ESPN, surreptitiously and shrewdly persuaded the Mountaineers in joining the Big 12 after tipping them off with knowledge of the leagues influential and participating role in the now real college football 4-team playoff scenario. I believe ESPN knew this and tipped WV off. Think of it as ESPN’s backhanded slap at the Big East for declining their TV contract offer, while synchronously degrading the league in the eyes of any future competing network.
There’s been some back and forth on whether a conference championship should be required for inclusion in the four-team playoff field. I say absolutely. This is another shortcoming of only four teams in the mix. With eight, you’d see all six power-conference champions (yes, including the football-diminished Big East), plus two at-large teams. But with the field as tight as it will be in 2014, how could the NCAA allow a second-place SEC team in and exclude, say, the champion of the Pac 12 or ACC? The entire reason for creating this new system is to further legitimize the national champion with performance on the field. If a team falls to second place in its league . . . tough beans. (Miami-Boston would have been a better NBA Finals this year than Heat-Thunder, but the Celtics happen to live in the Eastern Conference with Miami. Tough beans.)
Money certainly played a role. The BCS currently generates about $180 million from its television contract with ESPN, but some predict when negotiations on a new deal open this fall, a four-team playoff could be worth $400 million.
But the answer university presidents are likely to get from the commissioners will be much simpler. After spending decades defending the parochial nature of college football to the public, the fans left college football’s decision makers with no other choice.
“Any system only can last so long without support and with just constant criticism,” Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany said. “The level of criticism was so significant over time that, in some ways, it forced the change. … The BCS never had any vocal supporters.”
Pro FSU staying in the ACC folks hang their hat on three things:1.) ACC will rise again in FB and will not be left out of the playoff moving forward2.) Geographic rivals are in ACC and academic climate is much better3.) There is still nothing proven with respect to Big 12 financial benefit compared to the ACC. Until this is shown and documented by real sources then there is no reason to consider a moveJust curious if anyone has seen anything explaining how staying in the ACC will benefit FSU? Anybody seen ACC bloggers making a case for FSU to stay recently? Also, does FSU have a timeline?
The WVU board is just plain hard to read anymore when it comes to expansion rumors. They all fight with each other and create new topics with nothing more than a sentence or insult...its just dumb.
Final details of the new Tier 1 is still speculative. Contract hasn't been signed. Also, nothing concrete on Tier 3 value for FSU (at least that has been released). The result is estimates and speculation that cannot be proven, but is highly likely a close estimate. It leaves rooms for doubters to say where is the proof though.
Thedude, for what its worth, is pretty much saying that the big 12 ****ed up and nothing will likely be happening at least by the 2013 season.
Thedude, for what its worth, is pretty much saying that the big 12 ****ed up and nothing will likely be happening at least by the 2013 season.
Don't know how that classifies as a **** up - things can go 100% right for the Big 12 and nothing will officially happen until 2013 at the earliest.