Crossroads 2

Craig41

New Member
Apr 19, 2006
14
8
3
Again as a disclaimer, playing through high school and coaching kids does not make me qualified to know how to coach at the D1 level, so this is only an opinion. Last week, I posted that the next 2 weeks will determine if we become a team or spiral into disarray. Personally, I am very encouraged by the disciplinary action coach McDermott took (and really want him to succeed), but the results of the game gave me little indication that the team is ready to play together and compete for an upper half finish in the Big 12. Time is slipping away. It has been stated many times that our rebounding is poor, there have been people questioning the PG play, the lack of offensive movement, no defensive rotation etc. For me, I am just as disappointed on what I see as a lack of fundamentals when defending against the dribble drive. Outside of Christopherson (and from what I saw with Buckley), we do not maintain a low defensive base. Running at penetrators or standing up on defense will not get it done at this level. I just do not understand how we still have (in my opinion) fundamental gaps this late into the season?

So what needs to change? Obviously, the players have to take their roles and responsibilities to heart and want to play as a team. We need to defend the dribble better and rebound (including the guards taking heart to box out and position themselves better). We should get the ball to Brackins on the wing extended more and not just on the low block, back to the basket. Offensively, the ball needs to move quicker making the smart pass and not trying the great pass.

I would also make rotational lineup changes. My thoughts are as follows (prior to hopefully Colvin’s return):

Hamilton; play 28-30 minutes. He competes on the boards and defensively will rotate to help. He understands his offensive role and can score one on one in the low block (assume teams will continue to double Brackins).
Brackins; play 33-35 minutes. Brackins is our top offensive threat.
Dendy; 15 – 20 minutes. LaRon brings energy, but needs to improve interior defense and isn’t as strong on the low block. Yes, he attacks the rim, but we do not run much and when teams are hedging to double Brackins which will open up the low block.
Gilstrap; 25 minutes. He can be our best wing defender, rebounder and a solid offensive threat, but isn’t consistent and makes mistakes during the game (turnovers, ill advised shots)
Boozer; 15- 20 minutes. Energy, hustle, but he must minimize mistakes. Played great at NDSU, however, this is only one game.
Christopherson 20 minutes. Best on ball defender, good shooter but needs to rebound as a guard better. We need rebounding support from all positions.
Staiger; 10 – 12 minutes. Great spot up shooter, but not a solid ball handler, or effective at rebounding. Defensive fundamentals need to improve or teams will isolate him and challenge him one on one.
Garrett; 28 – 30 minutes. Ball handler with ability to handle defensive pressure. Offensively, his mid range game is improving.
Buckley; 15 – 18 minutes. Ball handler and (from the limited game time I have seen, so this may end up not true) a good on ball defender. He has good range, but not a great penetrator.


I would like to see at times a three guard line-up with possibly Garrett, Buckley and Christopherson (best perimeter defensive alignment?).

So again, my thoughts. Regardless, we need to make big steps as a team very soon. I started the season thinking we should be in the NCAA tournament and I really believe that anything less would be under achieving. And yes as much as I like coach, he is responsible for his recruits, their play, his coaching and the effectiveness of his offensive and defensive sets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PGreen ISU '92
"We should get the ball to Brackins on the wing extended more and not just on the low block, back to the basket. "

That's part of the problem right now, he never gets the ball close to the basket. He's always at least 10-15 feet away from the hoop whenever we get an entry pass to him.
 
"We should get the ball to Brackins on the wing extended more and not just on the low block, back to the basket. "

That's part of the problem right now, he never gets the ball close to the basket. He's always at least 10-15 feet away from the hoop whenever we get an entry pass to him.


I agree, if the double team comes at least he has more space. Always thought the elbow was the perfect spot for him.
 
I agree, if the double team comes at least he has more space. Always thought the elbow was the perfect spot for him.

I would have no problem with this either. A shot from the elbow should be a very high percentage shot for a skilled big man, and I don't think it would be any issue for Brackins at all, so I wouldn't mind seeing him get the ball here. And yes, it does give him more space to kick the ball out to a shooter if they bring a double team. And as has been mentioned, Brackins may be the best player on the team at making the entry pass to the post. At the elbow he is out far enough that he can look to make an entry pass to one of our other bigs.

I would much rather have him getting the ball around the elbow more often than out behind the 3-point arc.
 
I agree, if the double team comes at least he has more space. Always thought the elbow was the perfect spot for him.

Why not the free throw area? He is a good enough passer that if the double team comes from there, he could hit cutters. It also would seem to allow Gilstrap more room to roam around the basket, as a lot of times he seems to have more of a mismatch in the post than Brackins. Does that hurt because of the strengths/weaknesses of Garrett's game?
 
Good writeup. Personally I would play MG as much as possible (30-35 instead of 25), yeah he does make some mistakes but so does everyone else on the team and he is just plain a better player than any of our other options, both offensively and defensively.

I would switch Staiger and SC's minutes in your write-up in my opinion. SC has just not been very productive at all since we have started facing decent teams. Staiger disappears at times but at least he has the ability to get hot and keep us in the game with his shooting which he has already done several times this year. I'd play Staiger 20-25 and SC 10 minutes, of course depending on matchups and who is hot that could change.
 
kind of a side not but i noticed that alot of the players really dont know the plays.. which is pathetic.. mainly it being Dendy..i could here DG yelling at at him every time on the offensive side of the ball against NDSU
 
kind of a side not but i noticed that alot of the players really dont know the plays.. which is pathetic.. mainly it being Dendy..i could here DG yelling at at him every time on the offensive side of the ball against NDSU

I agree. This is not a by product of having to remember multiple offensive sets and a big reason that I don't think you will see a lot of minutes from Dendy. I like his perimeter defense for a big man, but it you can't get in the proper offensive set, your minutes will be limited
 
Gilstrap; 25 minutes. He can be our best wing defender, rebounder and a solid offensive threat, but isn’t consistent and makes mistakes during the game (turnovers, ill advised shots)

Um no, Quez needs to be playing as many minutes as possible. I want Quez to take a lot of shots and be aggressive offensively and defensively. He's a bigtime talent that we may only get for 1 Big 12 season; let's utilize him.
 
Quez has the potential, but I just haven't seen him play a consistent game. He defeinitely has game and you are probably right in that he needs to play more consistently for us to have a solid conference record. I would like to see him pull up form 10 feet instead of trying to get to the rim as much as he does. So, right now I would give minutes to Boozer, but Marquis could definitely earn more. Not sure how effective we would be with Boozer at the 3, Gilstrap at the 4 and Brackins at the 5 in Big 12 play based on I would like to see Brackins get the ball on the wing (or free throw line extended) and not on the baseline 8 feet from the basket.
 
First, Totally agree that's in troubling to see some very basic fundamentals are lacking on this team.

Second, playing time should be dictated by effort and following game plan. I would not support taking "quick shots" but would reward those players that are giving it 100%, totally wearing themselves out going to the rim, fighting for rebounds, playing defense, moving on offense, thus would have Boozer and SC playing more minutes. MG and Brackins our the best players. So for me, the minutes would be played by MG, Brackins, Boozer, SC, and suppose a mix of DG and Buck. Then mix in the others, with their minutes being dictated by effort. When the effort stops, they are removed and replaced.

Need to make it clear what controls their playing time... "Coach in Control". Once that's clear I think the increase in effort and focus on game plan will be contagious. McDermott can't be afraid to reward effort versus playing the "ideal players" that "should be better".
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron