This article is one of the worst pieces of crap I have read in a long time. Can someone point out to me one *specific* example in the whole diatribe? I don't believe that he supported his name calling with one bit of evidence. He expects us to believe that this Avalos is a raging atheist on a mission do destroy his good Christian world without presenting us one bit of evidence. What a bunch of bull.
I think with people like Deacer, his argument always boils down to: I believe in something strongly; you must also believe.