Teams
Forum List
Toggle sidebar

NFL: Vikings Radio Announcers Do Little To Hide Their Anger

I can't listen to it....what are they angry about?
 
Well then they are idiots too. That INT meant nothing. The game was going to OT regardless after the Vikings decided to run, run, penalty. Favre had to make a play. The play got picked. Didn't cost them the game and anybody who thinks it did is short sighted
 
:biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh:
 
Clones85' said:
Well then they are idiots too. That INT meant nothing. The game was going to OT regardless after the Vikings decided to run, run, penalty. Favre had to make a play. The play got picked. Didn't cost them the game and anybody who thinks it did is short sighted
Click to expand...

I would rather have Longwell try a 50 yard FG...it did cost them the game actually...or was it Hutchinson's fault for calling heads?
 
Clones85' said:
Well then they are idiots too. That INT meant nothing. The game was going to OT regardless after the Vikings decided to run, run, penalty. Favre had to make a play. The play got picked. Didn't cost them the game and anybody who thinks it did is short sighted
Click to expand...

Had Farve held onto it and ran, he probably could have made it damn close to the 30-35 yard line, setting them up for about a 50 yard field goal, which is well within Longwells range. Yes there are other plays that led to the situation, but Farve had the game in his hand with 30 seconds left and he ****** it down his leg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonestate78
Clones85' said:
Well then they are idiots too. That INT meant nothing. The game was going to OT regardless after the Vikings decided to run, run, penalty. Favre had to make a play. The play got picked. Didn't cost them the game and anybody who thinks it did is short sighted
Click to expand...


I believe Farv-ra could have ran 5 yards if not 8 - 10 and set the Vikes up in decent field goal range. He may have ran for it if he wasn't so banged up and sore. The Saints strategy of bringing the pain worked.....

I was surprised the Vikes didn't blitz more to put the heat on Brees
 
clones26 said:
I would rather have Longwell try a 50 yard FG...it did cost them the game actually...or was it Hutchinson's fault for calling heads?
Click to expand...

It would have been a 55 or 56 yarder. Not a 50. And yes Hutchinson should have called for tails. it never fails

chuckd4735 said:
Had Farve held onto it and ran, he probably could have made it damn close to the 30-35 yard line, setting them up for about a 50 yard field goal, which is well within Longwells range. Yes there are other plays that led to the situation, but Farve had the game in his hand with 30 seconds left and he ****** it down his leg.
Click to expand...


I've watched the replay a dozen times. Favre could have gotten 2 yards on that play if he would have run it. Tops
 
Viking fans can ***** about this one play for years but without #4 this year, you are no where close to making it to the NFC championship game.
 
It's kind of hilarious to see the Vikings fans turn on the only reason they were in the NFC Championship anyway. Without Favre and the **** poor way the Vikings ran the ball in the 2nd half of the season the Vikes would've been at best 10-6 and probably lose in the wildcard round.

Kind of reminds me of the ISU/Iowa NIT game. Vroman misses a free throw and for some dumb reason tackles the Iowa player who gets the rebound. Iowa player in turn wins the game at the line for the Hawks. A lot of cyclone fans hopped on Vroman for doing something so stupid but Vroman really was the only reason ISU was still in the game anyway, so it wasn't really appropriate to pile on him about it.
 
I'm devastated, we pi$$ed that game down our leg. Opportunities like this rarely come along, I'm so bummed.
 
jamesfnb said:
I believe Farv-ra could have ran 5 yards if not 8 - 10 and set the Vikes up in decent field goal range. He may have ran for it if he wasn't so banged up and sore. The Saints strategy of bringing the pain worked.....

I was surprised the Vikes didn't blitz more to put the heat on Brees
Click to expand...

Like I have said many times Favre couldnt have gotten more than 2 to 3 yards if he ran it. Watch the replay and while watching remember he is a 40 year old by the name of Favre. Not Vince Young

Vikings should have blitzed Brees zero times all game! Vikings defense played great but the times that the Saints had bigger plays was when the Vikings blitzed. The safety was never successful in his blitzes.

Every rags on Favre but nobody mentions the 3rd down completions he had the last drive. The 20 yd pass to Shiancoe after AP fumbled it for a loss of 10.
 
Clones85' said:
Well then they are idiots too. That INT meant nothing. The game was going to OT regardless after the Vikings decided to run, run, penalty. Favre had to make a play. The play got picked. Didn't cost them the game and anybody who thinks it did is short sighted
Click to expand...

Actually maybe not, Favre had at least 10 yards to run in front of him, he could have ran for 5-6 and slid or hopped out of bounds and you had an upper 40 yard FG. They usually make those in the NFL.
 
I love the Vikings but that made me laugh. It's refreshing to hear mutual frustration. It was tought to watch, but 1998 was MUCH worse. Maybe over time I've become numb to it?
 
brianhos said:
Actually maybe not, Favre had at least 10 yards to run in front of him, he could have ran for 5-6 and slid or hopped out of bounds and you had an upper 40 yard FG. They usually make those in the NFL.
Click to expand...

This isn't true. 5 yards in front of him there were 2 LB's. He would have gotten 2 yards tops
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Help Support Us

Become a patron
Top Bottom
Back