Updated Lundardi bracketology
- Thread starter dahliaclone
- Start date
It’s because we are returning to the dark days of cyclone basketball.
Espn and lunardi just don’t know this, yet.
Obviously Lunardi is on crack. I've been told next years team will be lucky to make the NIT.
jimlad needed?
jimlad needed?
Right now, I'd guess 7-10 seed with all the unknowns. The talent is there. A lot needs to come together to go higher, but it could happen.
5 seems optimistic now, but I'm sure we'll be on here talking about how the team underachieved come March to ONLY be a 5 seed. Cant wait!
That's the thing. The haters here will predict a 12 win season and then call it a let down next spring when we only win 20.
It is unbelievable that he gets paid to do this year round.
It's definitely an unknown how next years team will respond but we had pretty good depth on the bench and often times when guys are challenged to step up they do. When you're playing behind a guy like Shayok it's hard to show what you can do when your minutes are limited. When you get starter minutes makes a difference in your overall play.
Bracketology in May = Dumb
Correction...
Bracketology = Dumb
Correction...
Bracketology = Dumb
March 2020: “We were 2-1 to start the conference and KU started 1-2! How did we let the title slip through our hands again?”
I think Tyrese takes a big jump next year in terms of usage and has a good shot to lead the team in PPG. Nixon and Jacobson will get their share as well. Still need some others who weren't relied on as much last year to step up though (looking at you Conditt, Lewis and Griffin).
I'm guessing this is done with the idea that we're going to add a GT guard.
I'm guessing this time of year this is compiled with a highly complex process involving a dart and a dart board.
No way, only an uber educated expert could go out on a limb and list Duke, UNC, Kentucky and Michigan State as their one seeds.