- Mar 27, 2006
- 40,829
- 28,324
- 113
Hadn't seen this posted anywhere yet, but it's a pretty big deal.
Effectively the ruling prevents the NCAA from banning third parties from paying athletes to attend a particular school.
It's a temporary injunction, but the judge was pretty clear in saying that the NCAA's policy most likely violates antitrust laws.
"While maintaining competitive balance in college sports is “a legitimate and important endeavor,” spreading competition evenly across the member institutions by restraining trade is precisely the type of anticompetitive conduct the Sherman Act seeks to prevent."
apnews.com
Effectively the ruling prevents the NCAA from banning third parties from paying athletes to attend a particular school.
It's a temporary injunction, but the judge was pretty clear in saying that the NCAA's policy most likely violates antitrust laws.
"While maintaining competitive balance in college sports is “a legitimate and important endeavor,” spreading competition evenly across the member institutions by restraining trade is precisely the type of anticompetitive conduct the Sherman Act seeks to prevent."
Judge hands NCAA another loss, says compensation rules likely violate antitrust law, harm athletes
A federal judge has barred the NCAA from enforcing its rules prohibiting name, image and likeness compensation from being used to recruit athletes.
