Teams
Forum List
Toggle sidebar

Tell me I'm not the only one.........

C

clonefan1

Member
Aug 7, 2006
226
16
18
55
That thought the refs were absolutely terrible yesterday. I sat across from ISU's bench in row 3 and witnessed Wesley Johnson getting jersey pulled from behind RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE REF and a no call.

ISU would get called for hand checking and Texas wouldn't.

I don't normally complain about the refs, but yesterdays game was terrible in my opinion.:arghh:
 
They were the lousiest I have seen for several weeks. Just my opinion. They gave the ball to us when Sean Haluska dove into the guy. The call on Rashon over the 5-11 was not as good a foul call as some people claim. Rashon will attest to that. A five second call on BP wandering in the back court was crazy. Jiri was called for a couple of fouls that were miniscule. McD quizzed them quite a bit. The refs looks like they were from Rent a Ref.
 
Yes, the refs were bad, but it went both ways. How did Haluska get sent to the line in the second half when he and another guy were going for the ball? When they showed the replay I could not believe a foul was called on Texas.

I also can remember on a free throw by ISU that was clanked, WJ jumped over a guys back and it was not called, it was pretty bad too.

The refs did not cost ISU this game! ISU should not lose at home when they are up by 13 in the second half! I do not care if you are playing the Celtics!
 
Rahshon moved in front of Abrams and wasn't established. You can't impede the offensive player's movement without having pre-established defensive position.

It was a foul. A lousy way and time to get a foul as RC was somewhat duped into it by Abrams (thus the reason everyone is mad about the call), but a foul nonetheless.
 
I thought the 3 seconds call was the worst. Its college basketball, you don't call that unless its obvious. They had to be looking at that specifically to recognize that.
 
isuno1fan said:
Unbiased opinion is that they did an ok job, but many here seem to think it was the worst display they've ever seen.
Click to expand...


I respect your opinion, but what the hell were you watching yesterday????????

That was the worst job I've seen by a crew all year, in any game I've watched this season. My biggest harp is the inconsistency of the calls. They cost us the game, no doubt about it. I think that game tape needs to be sent to the Big XII and reviewed.

That game never should have gone into overtime.
 
cybsball20 said:
How was the 5 second call on Peterson a bad call? 5 seconds is five seconds, right?
Click to expand...


He was moving north and south and the defender was not totally in his grill. First time I have seen a play called like that in 40 years of watching games. Have you seen one just like that called before?
 
Landshark said:
I respect your opinion, but what the hell were you watching yesterday????????

That was the worst job I've seen by a crew all year, in any game I've watched this season. My biggest harp is the inconsistency of the calls. They cost us the game, no doubt about it. I think that game tape needs to be sent to the Big XII and reviewed.

That game never should have gone into overtime.
Click to expand...

I'm just saying that watching the game on TV and being completely unbiased, I only saw a couple questionable calls.

1.) no call on goaltending

2.) foul on Tx that sent Haluska to the line

You will get 2-3 questionable calls in everygame. It was an OK job by the officials because of that IMO. I didn't see any bias nor did I want to put my foot through my TV at any point in the game over a call.
 
cyclone14 said:
I thought the 3 seconds call was the worst. Its college basketball, you don't call that unless its obvious. They had to be looking at that specifically to recognize that.
Click to expand...


Barnes asked the officials to watch it and guess what...they did at his request and Jiri was in the lane for 3+ seconds. That is a violation. It was the correct call again.
 
So what does the group think about the dunk that cleared the rim on its way through, bounced back out, and was not counted. Was that a good or bad call. I only ask because that was a weird play and the ball made it down past the rim before bouncing bck up and out.
 
It has to clear the net according to Fran on TV. If that is the case, it clearly did not and thus was not 2 points as it was correctly ruled.
 
It was the right call because it didn't clear the bottom of the net. However, didn't the refs leave it on the scoreboard?
 
My biggest gripe was inconsistency in the hand foul department. I know that Augustin was always trying to put his hands on Petey and Garrett when they had the ball, sometimes reaching and fouling in the process, then we get called for some small hand touches at the other end.
 
I think the biggest question was how they called contact away from the ball. There was a lot of hand checking and contact coming off screens and establishing position. Not sure if they were right or wrong, but that seemed to be the most controversial part of their officiating.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Help Support Us

Become a patron
Top Bottom