Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What would have been a better position/situation for him?
I think the implication from the writer is he’d done better as a traditional 4-3 edge rusher.What would have been a better position/situation for him?
I think the implication from the writer is he’d done better as a traditional 4-3 edge rusher.
bend-but-don't-win defense.
Others have pointed out how we were almost toyed with defensively....when opposing teams had to score, they did so. Almost eerie how they would after we somehow mustered a play to score or get a lead, it was immediately answered by opponents scores.
Defense of course was NOT the issue last year and nobody would argue that.Yeah, our top 10 defense really was a mess.
Yep...they only scored after we scored...conspiracy. Good grief, don't be a doucher. This is a sports board. Hyperbole is allowed.So you think that other teams weren’t concerned about scoring when they wanted to. They only tried when we would score, otherwise they just took naps? This might be the dumbest take I have ever seen
This is true. McDonald is NOT a DE in a 3-4 scheme. He might, and I stress might, be a weakside DE in a 4-3 scheme.
He needs to be a LB in the NFL IMO, but supposedly the coaching staff at ISU felt he couldn't cover anyone.
We did not use him right at all though.
I'm excited for #52 Joey Peterson next year. Whenever he seemed to get into the game, I felt something good happened - him nearly getting a sack, creating pressure, making the qb uncomfortable, etcWill didnt get a lot of sacks this year because teams double and triple teamed him, which benefited MJ Anderson. Last two years Will played the same position and got double-digit sacks so he seemd to do just fine in the scheme.