Response from KCCI's News Director about kids throwing debris from bridge

Gary_ISU

Active Member
Apr 12, 2006
287
220
43
Saw in another post the discussion of the boys throwing stuff off the bridge. After watching the story on the evening news, I sent an e-mail to KCCI's news director about how disgusted I was that their crew just stood there and watched. Here is the response I got the next day. I guess his response makes sense.


Thanks for expressing your concern about our story on the kids tossing debris off the freeway bridge.

A couple of things you should know:

The crew went to the scene after hearing the police scanner report. They got there well after the incident had been under way. Other motorists had seen the problem and called police.

The crew was still two blocks from the bridge - the photographer was zoomed in all the way - making it look like they were a lot closer. As soon as they arrived and assessed what was happening, the reporter started going over to intervene but saw the police car coming up over the bridge. In fact, the officer in the patrol car saw the one boy toss the log over the railing. Viewers could not tell that from the way the video was edited.

In short, the crew instantly recognized it as a dangerous situation, went to intervene but saw the police arriving. We got there at the very end of the sequence of events and were there for only a few seconds when it ended. The video was edited to tell viewers the story of what happened - NOT to tell viewers what our crew did about it. in fact the story ran a lot longer than our crew was actually there at the scene because of the way the shots were repeated and slowed down.

We think this is an extremely dangerous situation. Anyone who drives on the freeway - which is everyone - can recognize that. This is at least the second such dangerous incident we know of in the past week. Our job is to tell the story of what happened as best as we can in hopes that the DOT, police and the community at large can then do their job to figure out a way to prevent this from endangering the rest of us.

Sincerely,

Dave Busiek
KCCI News Director
 
I hope these kids are punished severely. This is no laughing matter, at all. Since I live in Omaha, I don't know the details about this particular incident, but there was an incident a few years ago in Omaha in which a couple of boys tossed a large boulder off a bridge and KILLED a female passenger in a passing car below.
 
A few years or so back, I was visiting a friend. They have some land that is on the Raccoon River valley that they lease out to their neighbor for cows to graze on. Him and I were messing around there, and the KCCI response reminded me of it. They both stunk like bull$#%t.

I can imagine the film crew now; "This is pure gold."
 
Last edited:
Any guesses on where these kids will be in 10 years? Prison? A rundown trailer park? YMCA?
 
I hope these kids are punished severely. This is no laughing matter, at all. Since I live in Omaha, I don't know the details about this particular incident, but there was an incident a few years ago in Omaha in which a couple of boys tossed a large boulder off a bridge and KILLED a female passenger in a passing car below.

Actually, the kids were charged with "criminal mischief", the lightest little caress on the wrist the city of Des Moines could find. Which means they're already back vandalizing and stealing to their little hearts' content. Does anyone else here think that "making an example out of someone" has some merit?

And we wonder why our society has problems.
 
I like the response. The people in the camera crew are not police officers. They police had been called, what else are they going to do? Go over there and try to stop them? Not me...who knows what those kids are like and if they have any weapons on them. Let the police do their job. Not take the law into your own hands.
 
Even the police would tell them not to get involved. What's the problem?
 
I like the response. The people in the camera crew are not police officers. They police had been called, what else are they going to do? Go over there and try to stop them? Not me...who knows what those kids are like and if they have any weapons on them. Let the police do their job. Not take the law into your own hands.

:skeptical: They're little kids. If they were kids in their late teens I would agree with you, but these kids are so young that you could hold them at arm's length by putting your hand on their head if they got aggressive with you.
 
:skeptical: They're little kids. If they were kids in their late teens I would agree with you, but these kids are so young that you could hold them at arm's length by putting your hand on their head if they got aggressive with you.

True, but in today's world...I still wouldn't do it.
 
I like the response. The people in the camera crew are not police officers. They police had been called, what else are they going to do? Go over there and try to stop them? Not me...who knows what those kids are like and if they have any weapons on them. Let the police do their job. Not take the law into your own hands.

So you would honestly sit there and watch kids potentially kill somebody? How would you live with yourself had someone got killed?
 
So you would honestly sit there and watch kids potentially kill somebody? How would you live with yourself had someone got killed?

Honestly, if the cops are on their way I'm not going to try to stop them. If that makes me a horrible person, then so be it. I'm not a police officer nor do I want to be one. I may yell something at them but I'm not physically going to do anything.
 
The most amazing thing to me, today, is that people will actually just watch in stupid curiousity as someone is killed or badly injured. The reasons thing suck, today, is that it has become okay to "do nothing". In fact, "not getting involved" is celebrated as "good citizenship."

Frankly, when the police warn not to get involved, I snicker and think, "Dude, you are the 'hired help'. Why don't you just STFU and let citizens do what they need to do." I think all citizens have a responsibility to know the law, and act within their legal limitations.
 
The most amazing thing to me, today, is that people will actually just watch in stupid curiousity as someone is killed or badly injured. The reasons thing suck, today, is that it has become okay to "do nothing". In fact, "not getting involved" is celebrated as "good citizenship."

Frankly, when the police warn not to get involved, I snicker and think, "Dude, you are the 'hired help'. Why don't you just STFU and let citizens do what they need to do." I think all citizens have a responsibility to know the law, and act within their legal limitations.

I understand where you are coming from. This is just a little different with the age of the kids but you are telling me that if you saw a group of 20-somethings throwing stuff off a bridge, you would physically try to do something about it? Because I'm not risking my safety by trying to stop them when the cops are on their way. Am I in the minority?
 
Because I'm not risking my safety by trying to stop them when the cops are on their way. Am I in the minority?

Yes, you are. It would be very simple to just even drive up to the kids and say "hey!! WTF are you doing!?!?" and they'd more than likely stop. And kids like those aren't going to try to attack you in broad daylight.
 
The crew was still two blocks from the bridge - the photographer was zoomed in all the way - making it look like they were a lot closer. As soon as they arrived and assessed what was happening, the reporter started going over to intervene but saw the police car coming up over the bridge. In fact, the officer in the patrol car saw the one boy toss the log over the railing. Viewers could not tell that from the way the video was edited.

In short, the crew instantly recognized it as a dangerous situation, went to intervene but saw the police arriving. We got there at the very end of the sequence of events and were there for only a few seconds when it ended. The video was edited to tell viewers the story of what happened - NOT to tell viewers what our crew did about it. in fact the story ran a lot longer than our crew was actually there at the scene because of the way the shots were repeated and slowed down.

Sorry, calling bull-sh!t on this one.

1) Any jr high student can realize the edited sequences they aired must have took a significant amount of time to film. Kids on the bridge, kids off the bridge, different kids on (all throwing stuff), kid goes down hill to get log, kids comes up hill, kid throws log. I have little conflict is saying they probably have 5-10 minutes, if not more, of raw film. So to suggest they got there just at the end of the events is complete bull.

2) Why were you so far away? Well because you wouldn't have got any video if you moved closer and the kids would've seen you - which is what this is all about. They knew what they had and they weren't going to blow it. Fact is, if cops were imminent, they would've been on the bridge trying to get the "arrest". But the were GOING for the shot of the kids - nothing else.

Spin at it's best. This guy has a good career ahead of him.
 
Last edited:

Help Support Us

Become a patron