Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't agree as I think Brees and Favre had better seasons. Manning is a stud though
That had to be one of the closest votes of all time. All three deserved it.
I'd argue for Favre (not just because I'm a Vikings fan) but because of the huge difference he made for his team. Granted, the others teams would be screwed w/out them too.
Well said, this is why the vote had to be tremendously close as you mentioned.
That had to be one of the closest votes of all time. All three deserved it.
I'd argue for Favre (not just because I'm a Vikings fan) but because of the huge difference he made for his team. Granted, the others teams would be screwed w/out them too.
idk about that, vikings still have an amazing defensive line and AP to lead the way. If tarvaris jackson was taking the snaps, i still believe they would have won the NFC north, but in a more conservative manner
the only reason i saw manning winning it is because game after game after game he would lead the team to win at the final moments. The saints won games by different factors each game, their D, turnovers, or running the ball. Now without that, it would immediately go to Rivers, as LT and sproles had a very small run game through the season
It just goes to show that nobody matters in this league anymore other than the QB.
The lengths they got to protect them is insane.
I don't think you can in anyway say that. The Titans with Lenwhale running is 0-16 no matter who is under center.Facts are facts. CJ played on a team that went 8-8. They were 0-6 to start and then finished 8-2 with Vince Young. You can argue he is just as important to his team as CJ
I don't think you can in anyway say that. The Titans with Lenwhale running is 0-16 no matter who is under center.
Kind of like 2,000-yard running backs don't win the Heisman on teams that suck?I don't believe that VY is more valuable than CJ but their record indicates that he may be. Teams that start 0-6 and don't make the playoffs don't get votes for MVP unfortunately
Kind of like 2,000-yard running backs don't win the Heisman on teams that suck?
Which I never understand, everybody knows they are getting the ball almost every down. You'd think it'd make it that much MORE of an accomplishment.
They should change it to MVPCT.Pretty much. It's like, "how valuable are you if your team isn't even above .500?"
Honestly it is a pretty good question