I watched some of the Rider vs Siena game today and saw no fewer than 6 or 7 guards between the two teams that could have started for us. How far have we fallen when we, a team playing in one of the 2 or 3 best conferences in the nation, have to rely on Haluska, Lee, and Peterson (walk-ons). Along with Garrett, we do not have a single combo guard that can shoot the 3 and or dribble penetrate/create.
Is is painful to watch Peterson struggle against pressure, or Garrett walking the ball up the floor with under two minutes to go when we are down 9 so he can clank an uncontested 3. I don't understand how mid majors can make our guards look like inferior, nor can I stand to watch a bunch of no-name Nebraska guards take the game over down the stretch and beat ours in every phase of the game. Wesley Johnson or not - that is a team we should have beat with. With Rider or Siena's back-up guards, we would have!
I realize Taylor, Dunson, and McIntosh's departures left us shorthanded, but they too had their struggles on and off the court. What's the deal with our inability to land good guards? I pray that Buckley is good enough to start ahead of Peterson/Garrett.
Is is painful to watch Peterson struggle against pressure, or Garrett walking the ball up the floor with under two minutes to go when we are down 9 so he can clank an uncontested 3. I don't understand how mid majors can make our guards look like inferior, nor can I stand to watch a bunch of no-name Nebraska guards take the game over down the stretch and beat ours in every phase of the game. Wesley Johnson or not - that is a team we should have beat with. With Rider or Siena's back-up guards, we would have!
I realize Taylor, Dunson, and McIntosh's departures left us shorthanded, but they too had their struggles on and off the court. What's the deal with our inability to land good guards? I pray that Buckley is good enough to start ahead of Peterson/Garrett.