I don't think I've seen anyone make what I think is the obvious comparison from a style of play standpoint, which is Chris Beard's Texas Tech teams.
The defensive profiles are very similar. Force a lot of turnovers (TO%) and make it really hard for the opposition to score around the rim (2P%). In order to do those two things very well, you might be out of position at times which means you might give up more 3-point attempts (3PA%), opposition could get offensive rebounds (OR%), and you may have games where you foul too much (FTR), but in the end, you're playing the math that you will steal enough possessions through generating turnovers and the 2-point attempts your opposition takes will be difficult.
Both TJ's team and Beard's teams at Tech aggressively try to keep the ball on one-side of the court and really live in the world of "no-middle defense" and force the offense when they have the ball on the wing to drive toward the baseline.
The defensive profiles are very similar. Force a lot of turnovers (TO%) and make it really hard for the opposition to score around the rim (2P%). In order to do those two things very well, you might be out of position at times which means you might give up more 3-point attempts (3PA%), opposition could get offensive rebounds (OR%), and you may have games where you foul too much (FTR), but in the end, you're playing the math that you will steal enough possessions through generating turnovers and the 2-point attempts your opposition takes will be difficult.
Both TJ's team and Beard's teams at Tech aggressively try to keep the ball on one-side of the court and really live in the world of "no-middle defense" and force the offense when they have the ball on the wing to drive toward the baseline.
