Does Baylor Cheat?

I could ask myself that, or I could ask Quincy Miller. Here's what he said:


He also said that Drew was the first coach to contact him when the dead period ended, and that Drew was the first guy in the gym when he played, the last guy out, and he always made it a point to be there himself, rather than just sending an assistant. We can go round and round all day on this.

Quincy Miller's quote says nothing. A coach would be stupid not to tell him that he has to work on something. It's simple psychology.
 
Thought I'd bring this up. The three teams recruiting Royce were ISU, Baylor, and UK. Do we cheat?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikem
blah blah blah quote quote quote. Baylor was the first school to send the check in the mail. It'll come out in a couple years after all these kids go pro and everyone will forget about it. baylor cheats.
I'll be sure to come back and hail the almighty NostraJosh-mus.
 
Yes, because Baylor didn't have playing time to offer when we had 3 scholarship players after the Dennehy-Dotson scandal. You're right, ISU is the only rebuilding school that could offer playing time to overlooked players or transfer guys.

I figured playing time was a given.

And are you really saying that the fact that the coach is positive is a reason that you are pulling these guys in? That seems like an awful simple strategy. If hard work and being positive were the keys to getting top 100 classes, it would be a lot easier for schools to rebound from coaching changes, especially at non blue blood schools.

Drew has a recruiting method. He recruits in a fashion that brings top 10 classes to a school with not a whole lot to offer compared to who he is competing against (no offense, really. I'm an ISU fan, we are in the same boat). All he has is himself and his recruiting technique and I'm just not sold that "being positive" and "working hard" is how he did it. Lots of coaches work hard and are positive.
 
Not to mention they are a top 10 team and they had 5,000 people there tonight.
Sometimes I wonder how they went from an absolute joke and a murder scandal to what they are now. This with a coach tthat that never played college basketball and had 1 year of head basketball coaching experience at Valpo. Throw in the fact that they are a small private Baptist college in a city that doesn't exactly pride itself on nightlife....who knows...I just know we have to beat them at home.

It's not conspiratorial at all. They've never won the Big 12 and had little to no tradition before they started landing all world recruits. The school and town are not a huge draw to the average blue chippers either compared to some other destinations.

I wouldn't outright accuse them of cheating, but nobody with any sense would be surprised if something comes out at some point.
 
Well crap, how does any team that's not a historical blueblood ever become good at anything?

In Baylor's case, for the first time since they've joined the Big 12, has an administration that understands the importance of fielding competitive athletic teams. They also have loyal, big money alumni donors that can fund facilities at a level the is commiserate with other major BCS programs, hired a great trio of coaches in those three sports, and caught lightning in a bottle to an extent with RG3 and our Elite 8 run in MBB a few years ago.

That statement says a lot. Isu hasn't had great success over the years, yet they still have fan support. How many people were at the game tonight? 1000? Ames high brought in more people when they played in Hilton. So what does Baylor have that helps them land the recruits that they do?
 
Thought I'd bring this up. The three teams recruiting Royce were ISU, Baylor, and UK. Do we cheat?

Royce was going to go to Kentucky until he freaked out about the plane ride. I imagine Waco would have caused a similar issue.
 
It's not conspiratorial at all. They've never won the Big 12 and had little to no tradition before they started landing all world recruits. The school and town are not a huge draw to the average blue chippers either compared to some other destinations.

I wouldn't outright accuse them of cheating, but nobody with any sense would be surprised if something comes out at some point.

1. Play in Waco
2. Be Positive
3. ??????
4. Pull in Top Ten Recruits

I wonder what that curious Step 3 is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: josh4isu
From the article earlier, Pat Knight:
“I’d much rather beat some cheating SOB who cheats his *** off and everybody knows it,” Knight said. “They want to say they’re great coaches but all they do is buy players. I’d much rather beat a guy like that than one of my good friends.”

Scott Drew, for example, is reviled by many coaches in the Big 12 Conference. It was common belief that he paid players long before the NCAA began investigating the Baylor basketball program. Now that there’s an official inquest, all those other coaches probably feel justified in their dislike for the man who may have cheated his way from the conference cellar to its center stage.
 
I figured playing time was a given.

And are you really saying that the fact that the coach is positive is a reason that you are pulling these guys in? That seems like an awful simple strategy. If hard work and being positive were the keys to getting top 100 classes, it would be a lot easier for schools to rebound from coaching changes, especially at non blue blood schools.

Drew has a recruiting method. He recruits in a fashion that brings top 10 classes to a school with not a whole lot to offer compared to who he is competing against (no offense, really. I'm an ISU fan, we are in the same boat). All he has is himself and his recruiting technique and I'm just not sold that "being positive" and "working hard" is how he did it. Lots of coaches work hard and are positive.
You're right. It's not as easy as I made it sound in that post, but I don't feel like writing an essay and I'm about 99% sure you guys dont want to read an essay from a Baylor fan recounting the past 9 years of our basketball history.

In short, Drew plays a style of offensive basketball that is attractive to high-level recruits because he plays an isolation offense, much like the NBA plays. It's not the most successful system in college, but it preps guys well for the pros. He also allows his guys an almost unprecedented amount of offensive freedom. It leads to his style of offense being called "AAU ball", "streetball", and the like, but it's still attractive to those guys.

Couple that with the fact that Baylor is a unique institution in that it has remained true to its historical religious roots and that plays well to mommas in the Bible Belt, where we do most of our recruiting. Without fail, players leave our program and talk about how much of a family atmosphere it is. That kind of thing sells itself to kids who, sadly enough, come from broken family basckgrounds, in a lot of cases.
 
That statement says a lot. Isu hasn't had great success over the years, yet they still have fan support. How many people were at the game tonight? 1000? Ames high brought in more people when they played in Hilton. So what does Baylor have that helps them land the recruits that they do?
Maybe Drew is honest and the kids can see through the BS other coaches spew? Maybe a kid is just that much more comfortable with their coaches? Maybe some kids are only focused on how they relate to the staff and not how much tradition or fanbase a school has.
 
Thought I'd bring this up. The three teams recruiting Royce were ISU, Baylor, and UK. Do we cheat?

We didn't have NEAR the competition for Royce that Baylor had for their 2 top 10 players. Not a good comparison. I'm not saying Baylor is dirty...I'm just saying this isn't a great argument.
 
Maybe Drew is honest and the kids can see through the BS other coaches spew? Maybe a kid is just that much more comfortable with their coaches? Maybe some kids are only focused on how they relate to the staff and not how much tradition or fanbase a school has.


MAYYYYBE. but probably not. your a glass half-full kinda guy, and i can respect that. but baylor cheats.
 
You're right. It's not as easy as I made it sound in that post, but I don't feel like writing an essay and I'm about 99% sure you guys dont want to read an essay from a Baylor fan recounting the past 9 years of our basketball history.

In short, Drew plays a style of offensive basketball that is attractive to high-level recruits because he plays an isolation offense, much like the NBA plays. It's not the most successful system in college, but it preps guys well for the pros. He also allows his guys an almost unprecedented amount of offensive freedom. It leads to his style of offense being called "AAU ball", "streetball", and the like, but it's still attractive to those guys.

Couple that with the fact that Baylor is a unique institution in that it has remained true to its historical religious roots and that plays well to mommas in the Bible Belt, where we do most of our recruiting. Without fail, players leave our program and talk about how much of a family atmosphere it is. That kind of thing sells itself to kids who, sadly enough, come from broken family basckgrounds, in a lot of cases.

I hear you on all that, and those are great positives to your program and I would expect those to be major points that you use to recruit players, it is just that the level of success you are having with those tactics seems much higher than you would expect when you are competing against Kentucky, KU, Texas, UNC, Duke, ect.

For example, Fred Hoiberg played in the NBA, was an NBA talent evaluater, is a very positive coach almost never losing his cool, gives his players great confidence and freedom to shoot and play loose, gave 4 or 5 kids second chances to play D1 ball, has some tradition with Hilton Magic to play on, ISU is 4th in the Big 12 in sending players to the NBA since the Big 12 began, ect and he can barely get top 40 recruits to listen to him, let alone commit.
 
Haha, on the Pat Knight article, context is your friend. Pat was talking about the Sutton family and how he didn't like going up against them. Courtney Linehan openly admitted she jumped to conclusions regarding his quote, was reprimanded by her editor, and issued a public apology on the Lubbock Avalanche blog the next day. I know this because I personally emailed her editor to ask for clarification. As far as winning goes, Pat Knight doesn't know anything about that, aside from what he watched Daddy do.
 
Maybe Drew is honest and the kids can see through the BS other coaches spew? Maybe a kid is just that much more comfortable with their coaches? Maybe some kids are only focused on how they relate to the staff and not how much tradition or fanbase a school has.

I think rhoads is a pretty relatable coach. We got our videos all over YouTube. Where are our blue-chippers?
 
I think rhoads is a pretty relatable coach. We got our videos all over YouTube. Where are our blue-chippers?

Exactly. I'm not saying Baylor didn't have some things to put out there that would be attractive, I'm saying those things bring other schools top 50 classes, not top 10 classes.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron