The link below takes you to an article about Syracuse and their recent drug policy problems. My real question though comes from a sentence very near the bottom of the article talking about the possibility of Syracuse being accused of "lack of institutional control for failing to adhere to its own drug policy".
Syracuse reports possible drug policy violations to NCAA - ESPN
That's one thing but then the sentence goes on to say "similar to sanctions recently levied against Baylor University". Did I just let something slip by me? I don't remember hearing about any sanctions against Baylor. What sport? What were the sanctions?
As long as I have Baylor on the hook, the projections mostly show them with a #3 in the NCAA tournament. How does anyone justify a higher seed there than in the Big 12 tourney? I know RPI and SOS and all that plays in but doesn't performance count? They are 2-6 against Kansas, Missouri, Iowa State and Kansas State. How does that equate to a #3 seed?
Syracuse reports possible drug policy violations to NCAA - ESPN
That's one thing but then the sentence goes on to say "similar to sanctions recently levied against Baylor University". Did I just let something slip by me? I don't remember hearing about any sanctions against Baylor. What sport? What were the sanctions?
As long as I have Baylor on the hook, the projections mostly show them with a #3 in the NCAA tournament. How does anyone justify a higher seed there than in the Big 12 tourney? I know RPI and SOS and all that plays in but doesn't performance count? They are 2-6 against Kansas, Missouri, Iowa State and Kansas State. How does that equate to a #3 seed?