Search results
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
That’s quite the goalpost movement. Well done.- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,728
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
That’s what I thought.- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,715
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
Defense stats please- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,696
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
It doesn’t bother me. It’s a valid criticism. I still think it’s cool how many people tune in to watch the hawks play, and how many people show up to games.- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,670
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
I mean, it’s ok not to like her. Especially a rival fan.- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,667
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
Wouldn’t surprise me. Prahalis was a turd.- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,663
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
That’s fine. I’m sure tOSU fans still loved Sam prahalis even though she was obnoxious- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,660
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
Am I supposed to be shocked that a rival fan is talking ****?- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,656
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
Lol, no. Also, still waiting for those stats showing how awful of a defender Clark is. Remember any obscure reference will do.- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,654
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
I wouldn’t say you heaped praise. I also don’t care if yin do or not. I’m asking for you to share where you are getting your stats of her being awful on defense. Like I said, any obscure reference will do.- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,575
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
You’re really stuck on this defense thing. I’d love it if you could post any stats showing how bad it truly is? I’d even settle for an obscure twitter post of someone other than you criticizing her for “not getting back”.- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,564
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
To be clear, I was referring to the idiots criticizing isu attendance. Not sure why that would get you worked up but have at it.- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,039
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
Are you new here?- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,037
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
I’ve followed the women’s team for as long as I’ve followed the men’s team. I listed to Brent Balbinot on pirated streams before they were on tv with any regularity. And I don’t give a crap about what some randos say about wbb. Fact is attendance numbers don’t lie and Iowa has been top 20 for...- SplitIdentity
- Post #3,026
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
Iowa wbb hasn’t been irrelevant for years. Top 20 in attendance every year since 2010. Yes I know ISU has been top 5 in that time. Congrats. Still doesn’t make Iowa irrelevant.- SplitIdentity
- Post #2,992
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
-
Monte to the Wolves!
Ha. 2 games max. I’m a Garza simp (yup) but he’s not an NBA player.- SplitIdentity
- Post #29
- Forum: Pro Sports
-
Monte to the Wolves!
With Monte and Garza the sky is the limit- SplitIdentity
- Post #22
- Forum: Pro Sports
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
No it’s a landline old folks call when they want to report observing a rare bird outside their 3 season porch on a cool summer morning- SplitIdentity
- Post #2,537
- Forum: In-State Rivals
-
Time for a Real Discussion About Caitlin Clark
You are really invested in Clark’s body language. It’s getting birder line creepy.- SplitIdentity
- Post #2,532
- Forum: In-State Rivals