Search results

  1. E

    Less than 6 wins and we've underachieved...

    I think when you get hammered by Baylor you can throw the conference strength excuse out the window.
  2. E

    Jones claims report covers for Athletic Department

    You may be right with the "devious" thought. What I find comical are the people (not necessarily you) who couldn't wait for the Stolar group's report....."NOW we'll know the truth!" Well, we've gotten it and it didn't say what they hoped so now there MUST be more cover up. Do they expect...
  3. E

    Jones claims report covers for Athletic Department

    I can't justify it. I have no idea who should have or who dropped the ball on that.
  4. E

    Jones claims report covers for Athletic Department

    To be honest DaddyMac I've forgotten what your original question was!
  5. E

    Jones claims report covers for Athletic Department

    I was about to ask some of them the same thing. :smile:
  6. E

    Jones claims report covers for Athletic Department

    Don't you think that VP was interviewed by the Stolar group during their investigation? Are you that big of a conspiracy theorist or is it simply because it's the U of I? What would this outside group have to gain by covering up a cover up?
  7. E

    Jones claims report covers for Athletic Department

    I agree with you that some things about this are sickening. There is no doubt about that. The fact remains the outside group hired to investigate found NO evidence of a cover up by the athletic department.
  8. E

    Jones claims report covers for Athletic Department

    And what did the second investigation reveal about the athletic department's covering up anything? Yep. No cover up. Of course ignoring that fact is more fun for ya, isn't it?
  9. E

    Jones claims report covers for Athletic Department

    Clear to everyone? It's been investigated twice, once by the BOR and then the Stolar group. You think they are both involved in keeping a coverup by the athletic department quiet or did they each just miss it in their investigations?
  10. E

    Iowa rape case: Mother's allegations researched

    I was referring to the fact a large % of sexual assault cases never go to trial, but if a conspiracy theory suits you have at it.
  11. E

    Iowa rape case: Mother's allegations researched

    I'll be surprised if there is a trial.
  12. E

    Check out this homer coverage

    Weren't those stories written by different writers? I think Keelor wrote the ISU piece and Peterson wrote this one about Iowa.
  13. E

    Iowa Fan's Afraid?

    Pollard has done some good things in his short time here, but let's not get carried away with what he's done elsewhere. He got to Wisconsin nearly 10 years after Alvarez and I'd sat Barry had it rolling pretty good by then. If anything Jamie was there when it started backsliding a bit. :wink:
  14. E

    In need of some legal advice

    The drive from Norwalk to Indianola would be too much for a 9 year old? I think your problems with your ex in this are may be just starting. Good luck.
  15. E

    Marty and Miller and the Jon Miller bashing

    Marty doesn't get a lot of things, although they are right about Jon Miller being a shill. Tirrell (sp?) is a pot stirring idiot.
  16. E

    Gibbs decision coming 7/10

    I hear he's a Badger.
  17. E

    Predictions - Football

    Re: Predictions Kent State W UNI W Iowa L at Toledo L at Nebraska L at Texas Tech L Texas L Oklahoma L at Missouri L Kansas State W Colorado W at Kansas W
  18. E

    Gibbs Close to decision

    I've also heard Wisconsin. After that, does it really matter what order?
  19. E

    Gibbs Close to decision

    This one will be interesting. Each of those 3 schools has something that would seem to be in it's favor. I've heard Wisconsin, but that's just third hand stuff.
  20. E

    Gibbs article from the Iowa City paper

    So in other words darts, you can't show a "kool aid inspired rant" I've posted? I'd settle for where I spun any offers. If you took anything as such you missed my point (which was simply the $$ amount of a prepared offer doesn't necessarily indicate the order of preference) entirely. Either...