WILLIAMS: Analyzing Iowa State’s NCAA Tournament situation after a big week

ChrisMWilliams

Publisher
Staff member
Bookie
Apr 10, 2006
24,657
41,173
113
41
Bondurant, Iowa
www.cyclonefanatic.com
Oklahoma Sooners forward Jalen Hill (1) defends Iowa State Cyclones guard Tyrese Hunter (11) at James H. Hilton Coliseum. The Cyclones win 75 to 54. Mandatory Credit: Reese Strickland-USA TODAY Sports



AMES — In the eyes of many Iowa State fans, after blowing a 15-point second half lead to Kansas State last Saturday, the world was all but coming to an end. 



Seven days later, with two conference wins to show for it (at TCU on Tuesday and 75-54 over Oklahoma on Saturday), the Cyclones are right back in the thick of things when it comes to landing an NCAA Tournament berth under first-year head coach T.J. Otzelberger



There is still work left to be done, but let’s take a look at where things standing heading into the final stretch of the season. 



First things first … 



We need to acknowledge what the NCAA Tournament committee did on Saturday...

Continue reading...
 
2 more wins and its no doubt. But florida won today. Bad day for us with bubble results and the non-con teams not helping our net.
Iowa finally got a quad 1 win…so that helps us and they’re projecting in which makes absolutely no sense
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigCyFan
1 more win and we're in, 2 more and we're a single-digit seed. The committee's message today with the Top 16 said everything we needed to know - Quad 1 wins are going to mean way more than NET. You have to actually beat teams, not just show that you could based on analytics. How can you keep Houston lower than a 4 seed when they are #4 overall in NET? That's 1-seed quality, right? Oh, they have 0 Quad 1 wins...same with putting Wisconsin and Providence in the Top 16.

No way they will keep us out with 19 overall wins and 8 Q1. No way. I bet we're actually no worse than a 9 seed at that point. We might even be in after today, but they'd have a hard time justifying a team that went 5-13 in their conference even if our overall resume is tournament-worthy, so they'd probably keep us out or maybe put us in Dayton.
 
1 more win and we're in, 2 more and we're a single-digit seed. The committee's message today with the Top 16 said everything we needed to know - Quad 1 wins are going to mean way more than NET. You have to actually beat teams, not just show that you could based on analytics. How can you keep Houston lower than a 4 seed when they are #4 overall in NET? That's 1-seed quality, right? Oh, they have 0 Quad 1 wins...same with putting Wisconsin and Providence in the Top 16.

No way they will keep us out with 19 overall wins and 8 Q1. No way. I bet we're actually no worse than a 9 seed at that point. We might even be in after today, but they'd have a hard time justifying a team that went 5-13 in their conference even if our overall resume is tournament-worthy, so they'd probably keep us out or maybe put us in Dayton.
You’re right. It’s the same situation as Kansas and Kentucky. Kentucky is ranked higher in NET, and they killed Kansas at Allen Fieldhouse. The committee put Kansas over Kentucky. Why? Because Kansas has more Quad 1 wins.
 
That’s insane.

I think our fanbase is so primed for disappointment that we're really underestimating the position the team is in. We could possibly break the model if we finish 5-13 or 6-12 in the league, because when you compare our overall record and Q1 wins we'll be way, way better than every other team you'd compare us with. Let's just win out at Hilton and then be really happy on Selection Sunday when we get like a 6 seed and people are screaming at us.
 
I think our fanbase is so primed for disappointment that we're really underestimating the position the team is in. We could possibly break the model if we finish 5-13 or 6-12 in the league, because when you compare our overall record and Q1 wins we'll be way, way better than every other team you'd compare us with. Let's just win out at Hilton and then be really happy on Selection Sunday when we get like a 6 seed and people are screaming at us.
Yeah I said this at 16 wins but I thought 19 was the magic number to make the dance. Get to 20 and we’re likely a 7 seed. Win one in KC and we could be a 6. Whoever we play in Hilton South will most likely be another Q1 opportunity.
 
Yeah I said this at 16 wins but I thought 19 was the magic number to make the dance. Get to 20 and we’re likely a 7 seed. Win one in KC and we could be a 6. Whoever we play in Hilton South will most likely be another Q1 opportunity.

I went through yesterday and took a brief look at resumes, and put us on the 6 line coming into today. You could even have an argument for higher as I'm not sure Ohio State or LSU have a better resume than we do. Also, I got 16/16 right in matching the committee's seed release, so...
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron