Yeah, these discussions and threads always kind of end up being the same argument in different ways without some type of metrics to fairly assess...but again, WAY too many variables.
I have a friend (a negative nancy cyclone "fan") that isn't bought in Haliburton is good in the NBA "he's a stat stuffer.....and if he's so good...why didn't ISU win when he was there?"
If the metrics is "money earned in pro ball" or "titles won" or "stats" or..... you can start making a case for anyone.
Luka Garza was the NPOY at Iowa...so in theory is he the best ever Hawk? On the "at Iowa matrix" would be hard to argue that....but beyond Iowa, certainly not.