**** WBB: Gamethread - Cyclones host UNI at 6:30 p.m. ESPN+ ****

3-4 from Audi from 3 this season. Teams will have to come out to guard her if she an open look and I hope Bill and the staff is telling her not to hesitate to shoot it if they give her that. That's a huge advantage to be able to stretch the defense a bit if they have to come out of the paint to guard Audi on the perimeter. She has already shown she is a capable passer from the post so adding another dimension to her game where the defense has to commit and make and adjustment if she will take that shot if they give it to her is great.
 
Now that I'm home again, could someone maybe please explain to me how UNI #32 fouled out and UNI shot the free throws???

I think the regular foul was called on UNI #32, but I think ISU #0 pushed UNI #0 (or someone) afterwards.

The announcer referred a few times to an "intentional foul," but I think they meant "flagrant foul."

So UNI #0 got to shoot free throws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: acoustimac
I think the regular foul was called on UNI #32, but I think ISU #0 pushed UNI #0 (or someone) afterwards.

The announcer referred a few times to an "intentional foul," but I think they meant "flagrant foul."

So UNI #0 got to shoot free throws.

MBB: "Flagrant 1"
WBB: "Intentional Foul"

MBB: "Flagrant 2"
WBB: "Disqualifying Foul"
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cycsk
I think the regular foul was called on UNI #32, but I think ISU #0 pushed UNI #0 (or someone) afterwards.

The announcer referred a few times to an "intentional foul," but I think they meant "flagrant foul."

So UNI #0 got to shoot free throws.
Shouldn't we have been given free throws for the foul that #32 committed?
 
Won by 17 didn't feel like it, bad night by the reffing crew. Nice job by the ladies to not get rattled after getting down early.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RagingCloner
I think the regular foul was called on UNI #32, but I think ISU #0 pushed UNI #0 (or someone) afterwards.

The announcer referred a few times to an "intentional foul," but I think they meant "flagrant foul."

So UNI #0 got to shoot free throws.
In both reviewed calls last night, a regular foul was called on 1 team resulting in 2 shots and then a intentional foul (as announced inside Hilton) was called on the opposing team resulting in 2 shots and the ball awarded to the team that the regular foul was called on.

Really strange situation that you don't see much in the ladies game but, last night was a rough and tumble rock fight.

I'm not actually sure what the correct terms are as far as flagrant vs intentional. but, I'm also not sure it really matters because they are administered the same?? I believe the calls were administered correctly given what was called.

With that said...................the officiating was very bad!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY
I'll make one other note. McDermott was unbelievable for UNI and I thought it was interesting that on postgame radio, BF compared her to Caitlin Clark. Not sure I'd go that far but, high praise from BF
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: NWICY

Help Support Us

Become a patron