At this point, Iowa hasn't beat a single team guaranteed to end with a record over .500. They have four chances to have beat a 7-5 team. If ISU beats KSU, if NW beats Illinois, if Wiscy beats Minny or if Rutgers beats Maryland. I could see the three B1G teams all losing to end 6-6 and I am not confident of ISU in Manhattan. And that includes against their two tune up teams (Utah State 6-6, W Michigan 4-8).
Ugh, what happens when they play a team with a pulse next weekend? It would have to be at least 42.5 before I would consider the under. East winner -42?
Got a preview of the carnage that is about to happen when they got their a*s handed to them by Penn State -- which finish THIRD in their division.
Similar to the rumor back then of the Big Ten making a backdoor deal with Wisconsin to get absolutely curb stomped by Ohio State 56-0 the first year of the playoff?
I really hope you are right. The thing is, you should be right, but this year has been weird.
Iowa has half a team.
why would kim reynolds do that
No, just have the officials not call holding for a few plays and let Mich/OSU get two touchdowns and you have guaranteed that Iowa can’t win. 14 points will ensure an Iowa loss.
Be interesting to see how The Game plays out but I feel opposite about Michigan. I think this is Khaki pants best team yet. It's the best they've been at quarterback and defense might be even slightly better. Ohio State is so much different than recent years that it's hard to compare but i think you're correct on them
Yeah, but in case you haven't heard: Kim Reynold's career is over now... per President Donald Trump.
i literally had no idea who the person was talking about. caitlyn clark would be the princess of iowa
Even if that’s true, it doesn’t matter. I’m of the opinion that Michigan or tosu won’t even spit on it first before rawdogging them out of the gate.
It’s incredible how much this still sticks in the craw of Kirk and Iowa fans, particularly when it’s been explained over and over again that 1) it was the correct call, 2) no, it wasn’t a penalty (ineligible for review) and 3) yes, the replay officials have the ability to make that call even if the onfield officials didn’t tell Kirk that.
