F*CK IOWA

This is what wikipedia says about reviewable plays in college:

"In 2006, the NCAA Football Rules Committee enacted instant replay guidelines and added them to the football playing rules. For games involving two schools from the same conference, league policy determines whether replay will be used. For non-conference games, the home team makes the determination.

Plays involving the sideline, goal line, end zone and end line, as well as other detectable situations, are reviewable (e.g., fumble/no fumble, pass complete/incomplete, touchdown/no touchdown, runner down/not down, player or ball inbounds/out of bounds, clock adjustments). "

This would fall under "touchdown/no touchdown", runner down/not down", and "player or ball inbounds/out of bounds" at the minimum. It was certainly reviewable.
 
When they went back to receive the kick, I told some friends, you just watch him return this kick.
Ya, they got screwed, but its about GD time it happened to them and not us. How many times has ISU not gotten the benefit of a call, a lot over the years?

This is what happens when you are living on the edge game after game, you are not always going to get every break. Screw EIU and their fanbase.
You know the best part of the whole thing, was watching the look on TV of their fanbases faces knowing they had gotten another miracle win, and then seeing it yanked out from under them. Could not happen to a more deserving fan base.
 
Alarson, you dumbed my response. What part is dumb? What part of that play is reviewable under the rulebook?

Do you think they should review things not allowed to be reviewed?
Well, for one, it was a scoring play. Should they not be allowed to review a controversial scoring play?
 
I give the refs credit for making the correct call under a great deal of pressure....showed tremendous courage.

But I was disappointed they allowed the Hawkeye crowd to pelt the Minnesota bench with water bottles after the call was made. It was so bad that PJ had to move his players and coaches onto the field to avoid getting hit. PJ screamed at the refs for an unsportsman call, and he was 100% correct, but the refs allowed the riot to continue. Hawkeye fans showing their true colors .
 
Last edited:
When they went back to receive the kick, I told some friends, you just watch him return this kick.
Ya, they got screwed, but its about GD time it happened to them and not us. How many times has ISU not gotten the benefit of a call, a lot over the years?

This is what happens when you are living on the edge game after game, you are not always going to get every break. Screw EIU and their fanbase.
You know the best part of the whole thing, was watching the look on TV of their fanbases faces knowing they had gotten another miracle win, and then seeing it yanked out from under them. Could not happen to a more deserving fan base.
Yeah, you can’t play like that and expect to win every game. Eventually one of those is going to go against you
 
Does Iowa's interim AD go ahead and fire Brian since she is Brian's official supervisor? As a Cyclone fan, I pray she doesn't, but how on earth do you allow a coach who ranks dead last in the nation 2 years in a row to keep their job?

If she doesn't can him, Hawkeye fans will go nuts.
 
When they went back to receive the kick, I told some friends, you just watch him return this kick.
Ya, they got screwed, but its about GD time it happened to them and not us. How many times has ISU not gotten the benefit of a call, a lot over the years?

This is what happens when you are living on the edge game after game, you are not always going to get every break. Screw EIU and their fanbase.
You know the best part of the whole thing, was watching the look on TV of their fanbases faces knowing they had gotten another miracle win, and then seeing it yanked out from under them. Could not happen to a more deserving fan base.
Iowa didn’t get screwed, watch the replay, Cooper, at best was calling for a fair catch, at worst was trying to pull some fuckery and throw Minny off. The only mistake the refs made was not throwing the flag immediately.
 
Iowa didn’t get screwed, watch the replay, Cooper, at best was calling for a fair catch, at worst was trying to pull some fuckery and throw Minny off. The only mistake the refs made was not throwing the flag immediately.
It's not a penalty, it's just a dead ball when the receiving team catches it, so there's no reason to throw a flag. In this type of situation, the refs are supposed to allow the play to run to its conclusion and then do a review, so I think they handled it correctly.
 
It's not a penalty, it's just a dead ball when the receiving team catches it, so there's no reason to throw a flag. In this type of situation, the refs are supposed to allow the play to run to its conclusion and then do a review, so I think they handled it correctly.
Ok, my bad, I thought it was a penalty to call a fair catch, but then attempt to run , to gain yards after the catch.
 
Iowa didn’t get screwed, watch the replay, Cooper, at best was calling for a fair catch, at worst was trying to pull some fuckery and throw Minny off. The only mistake the refs made was not throwing the flag immediately.
Looking at the rule it was an invalid fair catch, meaning that DeJean's motioning of the arm meant the officials should have whistled the play dead and not allowed a return. That is what the rule book says, I do not have a problem with it.
But by the same token, if one of the Minnesota players had light him up after he caught the ball, they would not have thrown a flag.

Believe me I hate EIU more than most, but it was a horrible call, I am not jaded enough to not say that. I loved it, but let's get real here, no way was Dejeans' going to fair catch the ball in that situation.
 
Looking at the rule it was an invalid fair catch, meaning that DeJean's motioning of the arm meant the officials should have whistled the play dead and not allowed a return. That is what the rule book says, I do not have a problem with it.
But by the same token, if one of the Minnesota players had light him up after he caught the ball, they would not have thrown a flag.

Believe me I hate EIU more than most, but it was a horrible call, I am not jaded enough to not say that. I loved it, but let's get real here, no way was Dejeans' going to fair catch the ball in that situation.
How was it a horrible call?
 
My son just told me about the fair catch interference earlier. Did de Jean actually stick his arm out to make contact with the defender to get the call? If so, it makes it seem like he is definitely trying to play the system and leads credence to him trying to confuse the MN players.
 
It's not a penalty, it's just a dead ball when the receiving team catches it, so there's no reason to throw a flag. In this type of situation, the refs are supposed to allow the play to run to its conclusion and then do a review, so I think they handled it correctly.
I agree. Cooper clearly waived his left hand and pointed with his right. A person can argue whether him arm/hand was high enough to signal a fair catch. However, he clearly waived his hand/arm. Therefore, it’s a fair catch in my book.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: flycy
Looking at the rule it was an invalid fair catch, meaning that DeJean's motioning of the arm meant the officials should have whistled the play dead and not allowed a return. That is what the rule book says, I do not have a problem with it.
But by the same token, if one of the Minnesota players had light him up after he caught the ball, they would not have thrown a flag.

Believe me I hate EIU more than most, but it was a horrible call, I am not jaded enough to not say that. I loved it, but let's get real here, no way was Dejeans' going to fair catch the ball in that situation.
It doesn’t matter what DeJean’s intention was. He waved his arm and that was against the rule. If a pitcher commits balk, it does not matter if he was trying to deceive base runners.
 
Looking at the rule it was an invalid fair catch, meaning that DeJean's motioning of the arm meant the officials should have whistled the play dead and not allowed a return. That is what the rule book says, I do not have a problem with it.
But by the same token, if one of the Minnesota players had light him up after he caught the ball, they would not have thrown a flag.

Believe me I hate EIU more than most, but it was a horrible call, I am not jaded enough to not say that. I loved it, but let's get real here, no way was Dejeans' going to fair catch the ball in that situation.
That's pretty much the difference between a valid and invalid fair catch. Valid provides protection, invalid does not. It literally does not matter his intent. He waved his arm, so he signaled a fair catch.
 
Since when do officials get interviewed about crucial calls? I'm stunned this actually took place.

Depending on the conference rules, it can be a really convoluted process -- so it doesn't happen often.

Generally, it's one person (pool reporter) who can request the interview, but it's limited to a question about the application or interpretation of a rule. Nothing regarding judgment calls.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: ca4cy
Similar to targeting in an idea world you wish you could have some intent judgement but it is what it is at this point with the rule. Always love seeing Iowa lose just wish it wasn’t freaking Fleck benefiting .
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: nrg4isu
Iowa didn’t get screwed, watch the replay, Cooper, at best was calling for a fair catch, at worst was trying to pull some fuckery and throw Minny off. The only mistake the refs made was not throwing the flag immediately.
He wasn't calling for a fair catch, he was directing his teammates to clear out on a short punt that he didn't feel he could catch on the fly, which might bounce and hit one of them (or even hit them before hitting the ground).

They made the correct call, but let's not pretend that he was actually calling for a fair catch or trying to trick anyone. He was just trying to avoid a situation like the one in the PSU game a few weeks ago and saw an opportunity to make a play.
 
So apparently the coordinators aren't going to be available this week during their bye week like every other year. The sort of makes me think Kirk is going to "reassign" Brian this week.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron