Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)



I have to think that these potential escalators will make it look like the PAC can have the same payout at the Big12. But I don't think the PAC can meet the viewership numbers.

Also an opportunity for Washington and Oregon to use this as leverage for unequal revenue sharing. Basically, you get paid out based on your viewership.

Will be interesting to see what happens tomorrow.
 
I have to think that these potential escalators will make it look like the PAC can have the same payout at the Big12. But I don't think the PAC can meet the viewership numbers.

Also an opportunity for Washington and Oregon to use this as leverage for unequal revenue sharing. Basically, you get paid out based on your viewership.

Will be interesting to see what happens tomorrow.
No matter what they are, they’d have a better chance hitting any viewership escalators if they were in the Big12.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SCNCY
Did a quick math on a PAC12 getting back to 10 teams, and doing unequal revenue to keep UW/UO happy, balanced on the backs of the 2 new members. These splits are modifiable of course, but just to give an idea of what they might be working with.

Total contract value $25M per team:
UW/UO = $32M
Other 6 = $27M
New 2 = $12M

Total contract value $20M per team:
UW/UO = $28M
Other 6 = $21M
New 2 = $9M

So if it is $25M per they can probably survive that I would think, unless all the games are on HSN and ION and they just hate that too much. Everyone should be happy enough.

If it is $20M per then it is really interesting.

FWIW, if Arizona were to stay, and they only do one add - the numbers look roughly the same, only slightly worse. $25M per probably works, but $20M per does not.

It's much worse with 12 teams, even though you have 2 more teams to eat partial shares. Just hurts the denominator, but no help for the numerator (since low value brands and no high value timeslots).
 
Could there have been numbers/deal there and GK didn't share because he was trying to get more?

The numbers almost have to be bad…otherwise, the numbers would start to leak so the Pac12 could start it’s victory tour.

I’m going to guess around $25 mil per school with almost all streaming except for 1-2 games of the week.
 
It’s tough to know though if it’s a special hurt or the normal layoff cycles. Streaming coming to a reckoning is perhaps unique, this era where they all loved losing money to pad their subscription #s.

Working with media companies myself you can set your watch by a cycle of huge layoffs and big hiring cycles. Employees are just faceless #s to these media conglomerates.
That’s why we need to kill the PAC now, we have no idea what things will look like in 5 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MugNight
A plane ride from LA to Ann Arbor to play a noon ET kick which feels like 9 AM to a someone used to Pacific Time. Body clock games are a real thing, and its much harder to go west to east than east to west. By adding teams in the same time zone, that reduces the number of those body clock games for the west coast schools.
What would really stink is Michigan flying to LA to play a 9am local start game!;)

I get your point, but I think the Big Ten and Networks are smart enough to create parameters on traveling to/from Pacific Time Zone.

But overall schools have always been dealing with travel inconveniences. A couple years ago Oregon & Ohio State played a 11am CT kick for a non-con game. Not ideal, but it happens in college & NFL enough.

Look at some conferences. The Big East stretches from Omaha to Providence and everywhere in between. The AAC will have a school in Annapolis and San Antonio. Conference USA travel from Las Cruces to Miami. Sunbelt from Harrisburg, VA to San Marcos, TX. Conferences with no where near the P5 budgets, who are OK with traveling thousands of miles to play a football or basketball game.

The travel argument might be real, but schools already ignore the cost & jet lag issues.
 
Longer trip means higher cost. And not just for the football team. You have to factor in all teams that are participating in the B1G. Track, tennis, golf, gymnastics, swimming, etc. Those add up over time.
I don't know. I heard an AD (think it was Pollard but not sure) say "Once you're on a plane, you're on a plane. Doesn’t matter muchba after that." Basically saying that it's the point that you have to fly instead of drive that really makes a cost difference, and once you're flying distance doesn't increase the cost much.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: 2speedy1

Help Support Us

Become a patron