Appreciate the honesty.Oh I’m not comparing the on field results, big ten is trash in that regard for football and basketball. The arrogance thing is 100% accurate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Appreciate the honesty.Oh I’m not comparing the on field results, big ten is trash in that regard for football and basketball. The arrogance thing is 100% accurate.
Recruiting was a huge reason Texas went to the SEC. They were losing recruits to SEC schools especially D-linemen. SEC is so dominate in most sports it's tough to not end up there if you are Texas.You know what has been consistent in history? Greed. There is a lot more money being left on the table by these top tier programs, even in the B1G and SEC.
Texas has the biggest budget in the land and an army of wealthy, football crazy donors. And they still left for more money. USC has money. ATM has money. OU has money. Most of these moves have been the rich trying to find ways of getting richer. Which again is a pattern that likes to repeat itself over and over in the history of our society.
What you are trying to say is that OSU, UM, PSU, and OSU are going to say they are rich and powerful enough and don't need to find a way to get more. I don't typically see that from the richest and most powerful people and organizations in society. They are always hungry for more.
Not sure what happens in the next 15-20 years, and nobody does. But one thing I will say to the above is history is getting tested every year now across many walks of life. There have been massive changes throughout every aspect of life that makes some history borderline irrelevant. Interest in sports from those 30 and under being one of them that has never really been a problem in the last 100 years. Things keep advancing, moving and changing at such a rapid pace we will see what happens. There is no patience for anything anymore, and hardly anything seems to have much staying power at a high level. Yes there are exceptions to that, but many things have immense success and then fade away much quicker the more advancing we do as a society.If you’re looking at history, saying the same thing that has always happened will repeat is far more likely to be accurate then the new radical departure. I could be wrong but I obviously don’t think I am.
I've been mentioning it since OuT. I literally mentioned it earlier today.Yep, the super 32 league model…one of the many potential hurdles not mentioned that very well could upset FriendlySpartan’s B1G utopia.
Exactly. Money isn't just money. It represents status among your peers.I dont think the big dogs will break off from the Big 10 and SEC for quite some time, but I do have to laugh at the wishful thinking that they're happy and making money so why would they do this? They're always going to be looking for more money. You don't think 10 or 15 years down the line ESPN might be willing to pay a lot more for a conference that consists of Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State, USC, UCLA, Wisconsin, Alabama, Georgia, LSU, Florida, Tennessee, Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Clemson, and Florida State? Of course someone will have to be at the bottom, but no one will care when they sign the contract that triples their revenue.
I threw out 7 years because that is the next deal or near there for the top conferences. The point I was making is if/when their media partners come with similar numbers or possibly even less than now, because they have maxed their value. People start coming up with ideas to make more.Michigan has never once gone into a media deal to negotiate themselves, that’s the point. Of course the conference has gone in and asked for more money and every time they have been happy with the payout.
I love how you can just throw out something like “7 years from now” and predict something so radical as a foregone conclusion.
And a year ago it was said the Pac was the most stable simply because of geography. And boom now they are the least stable by far.Because it’s never happened in the big ten and has never even come up. It is the oldest, richest, and most stable conference for a reason. It’s obv locked in for 7 more years and there is no reason to think they won’t get another deal 7 years from now to lock it in again. Sports are also often cyclical. Michigan was a dumpster fire for close to a decade. OU might be horrible in the SEC. Clemson when from being a joke to being considered a power that could very well fall back into irrelevance.
I agree with most of this except for one part. Michigan vs Georgia every week or similar games in the event of this super league isn’t going to be the draw. Those games are valuable now because they are the top of their respective conferences becuase they rack up the wins. Michigan in a super league is going to get crushed. After a few years of that all of a sudden Michigan is Nebraska and no one cares. A super league will destroy ratings not increase them. Especially when so many won’t be watching since their alma mater isn’t remotely involved.I threw out 7 years because that is the next deal or near there for the top conferences. The point I was making is if/when their media partners come with similar numbers or possibly even less than now, because they have maxed their value. People start coming up with ideas to make more.
7 years is the next real chance for it to happen really now that several are signed on the the current deal. The second point of the 7 years is, a lot changes, especially in these deals over the course of 5-10 years. A decade from now we probably dont have a clue on what the world will be like, let alone media, sports, and how money is used. 7 years may be the beginning of the push, to happen at the following contract, it may be when it all blows up, or maybe not.
Sitting here saying it will never happen, or this and that will never happen to the B1G is ridiculous. When billions of dollars starts floating around those that are paying and those that are pushing those figures, start demanding certain things. And at some point those paying Billions are not going to want to pay for Indiana vs Illinois. They are going to want OSU vs Mich, and Mich vs Georgia, and Alabama vs USC, EVERY Week.
I am not saying it is a sure thing, but I would never be so naive to think it could never happen.
Just as I am not naive enough to think Michigan's research money would suddenly go down because they are not in the B1G. Last I checked, the B1G didnt give anyone any money for research. They like to add up all the numbers from each school and claim it is B1G research money. But all that is, is a total from the schools. The B1G has noting do do with getting or providing any money for Academic research. No matter how much they love to claim it. Just like Stanfords academics would not suffer for being in the B12, that is ridiculous. If that was the case every school would be pushing to get into the Ivy league or something. And the B1G would be begging Stanford to come in, because it would give them all more academics...
You say michigan won't. What happens if OSU, Penn state, USC and Nebraska decide to take off to a super conference. Two of them have already left conferences. OSU "joked" about it and Penn state was independent for a long time.If they pushed the other schools would just say no. Also while OSU is top right now there is nothing saying they stay there. Bama is king yet from 1997-2007 they only had 3 ten win seasons. They also had 2 four win seasons and 1 three win seasons in that span. Just because a team is at the top now doesn’t mean they stay there. That is why unequal revenue sharing doesn’t happen in stable conferences because schools fortunes can change.
Thats already been solved. They cant travel to 3/4 of the states now, including Iowa. But just like ISU, the AD doesnt take $$ from the state, at least not for travel. So the State cant dictate where they go.When is the state of California going to enter the discussion. Since they are banning gas cars, lawnmowers etc, when will they limit institution travel to save greenhouse gasses. Put the teams on electric buses.
It's CA. Nothing is off the table.
It’s not a marquee matchup each week. Because many of those schools would end up stuck at the bottom. Also your viewership would rank because it excludes a ton of people. The moment you go to a super league that is when the revenue drys up because a lot of people will stop watching.
I agree with most of this except for one part. Michigan vs Georgia every week or similar games in the event of this super league isn’t going to be the draw. Those games are valuable now because they are the top of their respective conferences becuase they rack up the wins. Michigan in a super league is going to get crushed. After a few years of that all of a sudden Michigan is Nebraska and no one cares. A super league will destroy ratings not increase them. Especially when so many won’t be watching since their alma mater isn’t remotely involved.
When is the state of California going to enter the discussion. Since they are banning gas cars, lawnmowers etc, when will they limit institution travel to save greenhouse gasses. Put the teams on electric buses.
It's CA. Nothing is off the table.
Except these people dont look that far ahead. The look at if they can put the top teams in a league for 5 or 10 years it will be worth $$$$. They will worry about how some of them are no longer top teams after a decade and decide what to do. And most of these calibur teams even losing for several years will still be worth more than say the bottom 3/4 of the current B1G.I agree with most of this except for one part. Michigan vs Georgia every week or similar games in the event of this super league isn’t going to be the draw. Those games are valuable now because they are the top of their respective conferences becuase they rack up the wins. Michigan in a super league is going to get crushed. After a few years of that all of a sudden Michigan is Nebraska and no one cares. A super league will destroy ratings not increase them. Especially when so many won’t be watching since their alma mater isn’t remotely involved.
I dont think the big dogs will break off from the Big 10 and SEC for quite some time, but I do have to laugh at the wishful thinking that they're happy and making money so why would they do this? They're always going to be looking for more money. You don't think 10 or 15 years down the line ESPN might be willing to pay a lot more for a conference that consists of Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State, USC, UCLA, Wisconsin, Alabama, Georgia, LSU, Florida, Tennessee, Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Clemson, and Florida State? Of course someone will have to be at the bottom, but no one will care when they sign the contract that triples their revenue.
I've been mentioning it since OuT. I literally mentioned it earlier today.
Although I think it will be closer to 20 teams than 30. And it's years away yet (5 min, closer to 10).
If we went that way which I really don’t think we will (or not for a very long time) sure you could be right. Things have to align perfectly for that though and both my schools would most likely get in so I would be fine there. Although sparty could get left out depending on how they did it.
I dont disagree with this. I think it would be terrible for CFB and College sports in general. But I also believe when it comes to the kinds of money being thrown out there now, all bets are off. These people dont care about anything that makes CFB great, all they care about is how to capitalize on its popularity to the maximum degree.A break away super league will end up as popular as the XFL and G League in the long run. Most fans are going to watch where most of their schools are playing.