**** the refs

[Gunnerclone]

Refs were fine.

Lonely by week. Even lonelier life.

 

[CysRage]

Also known as, the Big 12 won't look at it and doesn't care about piss poor officiating. Nothing to see here.

 

[jsb]

Also known as, the Big 12 won't look at it and doesn't care about piss poor officiating. Nothing to see here.

Well that's about as pissed off as you'll get from Campbell.

 

[quasistellar]

Also known as, the Big 12 won't look at it and doesn't care about piss poor officiating. Nothing to see here.

whoa, lol, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a quote quite like that from Campbell regarding the refs.

If I was him I’d be ******* furious. Seems like OUR players don’t get the same safety and protection as other teams.

 

[IASTATE07]

I want to see a replay of the Ewers roughing the passer.

 

[jsb]

whoa, lol, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a quote quite like that from Campbell regarding the refs.

If I was him I’d be ******* furious. Seems like OUR players don’t get the same safety and protection as other teams.

No kidding.

 

[Gunnerclone]

I want to see a replay of the Ewers roughing the passer.

That was complete dog ****.

 

[sunset]

whoa, lol, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a quote quite like that from Campbell regarding the refs.

If I was him I’d be ******* furious. Seems like OUR players don’t get the same safety and protection as other teams.

I’m shocked that he hasn’t left by now. He will never get a level playing field in this conference. And Jamie doesn’t seem to be inclined to make a public spectacle of it. Whatever he is doing behind the scenes hasn’t achieved anything.

 

[Newell]

Is targeting reviewable if there was no call? Can you protest the absence of a call?

 

[Drew0311]

Problem is that ISU gets called for targeting if we were on defense. I don’t think there is any doubt.

No doubt we would have been called for targeting and they would have ruled Ewers down on the exact same situation

 

[sunset]

Is targeting reviewable if there was no call? Can you protest the absence of a call?

Didn’t it happen against us earlier this year?

 

[Farnsworth]

If ISU would have been called for targeting in that situation we would have been pissed too. The biggest issue is the inconsistcy of targeting. Hopefully they review this AGAIN over the offseason and treat it like a technical foul in Basketball. Grade 1 and 2 with malace your out of the game. on every single of the 15 targeting calls ISU has had against them in the last 5 years a grade 1. 15 yeards and stay in the game.

Sweet! Can we get another apology letter for the wall?

 

[alarson]

Brett Yormark’s Big 12 is somehow dumber than Bob Bowlsby’s. Quite an accomplishment in a little over two months on the job.

Gotta preserve the value of that matchup with OSU next week

 

[jsb]

Is targeting reviewable if there was no call? Can you protest the absence of a call?

YES. They didn't throw a flag on Freyler against Baylor. They reviewed it and kicked him out.

 

[alarson]

Didn’t it happen against us earlier this year?

yeah, the freyler ejection was called down from the booth.

 

[isuno1fan]

Also known as, the Big 12 won't look at it and doesn't care about piss poor officiating. Nothing to see here.

His knee wasn’t down before it started coming out. Clear as day actually.

Learn how to win a close game Matt.

 

[alarson]

His knee wasn’t down before it started coming out. Clear as day actually.

Learn how to win a close game Matt.

@Jeremy i think I have a candidate for the 'discourage' button.

 

[NoCreativity]

His knee wasn’t down before it started coming out. Clear as day actually.

Learn how to win a close game Matt.

Bull****, GFY.

 

[Rogue52]

His knee wasn’t down before it started coming out. Clear as day actually.

Learn how to win a close game Matt.

I think it was a fumble, but let’s not claim it was clear as day. If so, the official’s review should have lasted 10 seconds.

 

[qwerty]

Gotta preserve the value of that matchup with OSU next week

I thought it was probably a fumble but it was not clear what was called on the field. The referee announced on PA that the ruling was runner was down by contact is under further review. And if they toss Freyler for less than that hit, Cook should be out too.

What is the ruling if they had called him down on the field, review says fumble caused by an illegal targeting hit? Is it Texas ball, 15 yards back for the targeting?