Why does he get a pass? His defense has been responsible for all of our losses this year. Today was an absolute disaster on D! I can’t wait to no longer see a 3 man front! Time to innovate!!
Heacock
- Thread starter Gundog73
- Start date
He's always been bad in the first half. But WV and Tech we're new levels of bad.
Offensive let down tonight for the first several drives didn't help either.
We aren't talented enough to just show up and win games. Even against Tech. We need better recruits and a fast start. Once this staff gets up early. It is usually over
Offensive let down tonight for the first several drives didn't help either.
We aren't talented enough to just show up and win games. Even against Tech. We need better recruits and a fast start. Once this staff gets up early. It is usually over
Can we lock new posts for a few hours after the game ends?
I think that other teams have come up with plan to neutralize our defensive scheme. I put this loss squarely on the D today.
That defense has won us more games than it's lost us.
Heacock has been great. Let's not overreact
Im not saying to get rid of Heacock. Heacock came up with this defensive scheme after a loss to Texas in Ames. Perhaps its time to adjust it.
Look I’m frustrated with the speed of adjustments in numerous games this year but he gets a so called pass because he has made us one of the better defenses in football and kept us in a lot of games in the past with offensive woes.
I dont think this poster is serious about Heacock. For whatever reason he's trying to deflect criticism of manning and its weird.
Need a stronger secondary for his scheme to work, I assume. Also, not sure at have enough of a force up the middle to collapse the pocket with only 3 up front. Personnel just needs to improve a bit. I think we have the talent. It'll be a good D again next year.
We scored 38 and lost?? WTF are you talking about?
ISU put up 38 points. I don't think its a Manning thing, today.
Gundog buddy if we got rid of our coordinators after a couple bad games, Manning would have been gone after the first few games of almost every season.
It's laughable that we can't discuss this from a constructive criticism standpoint. He absolutely deserves some flak. As long as you go into it willing to admit he's one of the best in the game
Against a team that routinely gives up 50+. While being handed 14 points in the first half, or else they would have been held scoreless that half.
People bringing up how much ISU scored should look at what TTU has given up most games. 38 against that team is not the feat some of you think.