Rigged Officiating

I didn’t know the refs could tell us which punter we had to use. That’s ********.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wally86
blame them for September (our coaching staff). This loss was squarely on the officiating. This was like the 2017 K-State hose job.


Pretty close. Although it can be said with some certainty that the KSU game had the fix for Snyder.....I don't know about today. We still have games with UT and OU. I don't know. However like a few have said......it is kind of hard to ignore every controversial review went to WVU.
 
This fanbase has a massive victim complex.
I agree with this to a certain extent, but I also think blue-bloods don't necessarily have to deal with all the nonsense that we deal with

we literally have multiple apology letters from the conference -- does ou in football or kansas in basketball have any? or does any other team in the big 12 have apology letters at all?

not really something that we should beat our chest about lol, but it's just something that we'll have to overcome until we have sustained success for a prolonged period of time
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyclonehomer
Why in the world would it be rigged against one of the darlings of the conference?
 
The play clock was stunning to me.
Yeah, this was really bad. I’m not happy with the officials today, but this is something that is particularly bad due to the fact that it’s not really one of those judgment call type of situations. The ball has either been snappped or not when the clock is at zero.
 
Ignoring everything else, the hall “fumble” was a ****show of officiating. Each referee called something different on the field. The line judge who had the best view called touchdown, one ref signaled down before the goal line, one ref said fumble then called the play dead even tho the wv player wasn’t down who recovered the “fumble”. Never seen anything like it. 19 year old kids have to talk to the media, but these paid adults don’t. Something needs to change
 
Does anyone know if the big 12 provides any documentation or policy on how they evaluate officials / replay officials? (and how they keep accountability and ensure integrity?)

I see documentation on the website related to how no one is able to criticize the officiating publicly:

"Coaches, student-athletes, and institutional personnel are prohibited from making any public comment regarding the game officials or the officiating at any contest."

I'd be curious to see what the process is (if there is one)
 
The refs did not cost us this game. I know we got screwed, but our Swiss cheese D made those calls stand out. This is on the staff not preparing the team. This looked like a September game.


ACtually, they did. I know ISU played ****** defense, but they cheated ISU out of seven, and gave WVU at a minimum, four extra points. So yeah, they cost ISU the game.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron