4.81 assists/turnovers. A DWS equal to Rasir Bolton.What value does he offer?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
4.81 assists/turnovers. A DWS equal to Rasir Bolton.What value does he offer?
What's his Assist %? I believe it was 25%. That's ridiculous.He has the second highest turnover percentage on the team!
Just BS being spewed by CyTwins usually, but still new content.New content that’s not on the Iowa site about iowa?
What's his Assist %? I believe it was 25%. That's ridiculous.
If you want to go assist to turnover Bohannon is the best guard on the team. Toussaint is over 30% on his assist percentage but is the only one higher than Connor in turnover percentage4.81 assists/turnovers. A DWS equal to Rasir Bolton.
Rasir's is higher...What's his Assist %? I believe it was 25%. That's ridiculous.
Why would that not be your #1 priority? The entire focus of their offense is to work the ball through Luka. When you have a player like him, he should touch the ball every single time down the court if at all possible. Connor is the most efficient at getting him the ball in a good position to score.I'd probably say that's because there is a guy on the floor who LITERALLY cannot score and is on the floor solely to get Luka the ball. Also, again, you're jumping through hoops for Connor again.
PER puts an emphasis on scoring. Luka's PER is helped by Connor being on the floor.If you want to go assist to turnover Bohannon is the best guard on the team. Toussaint is over 30% on his assist percentage but is the only one higher than Connor in turnover percentage
Connor has the worst PER on the team so no he does not provide value
Bolton has a better OWS and the same DWS. He plays more minutes on a ****** team. Doesn't change the fact that he turns it over more times on his own than 3 of Iowa's starters combined. He averages more than twice as many turnovers per game than ANY of Iowa's starters.
Being the best player on a bad team, doesn't prove anything.Rasir's is higher...
Content? Are you referring to message board posts as "content"?I'm on both but there is new content on this site everyday several times a day about Iowa.
Because losing to #4, #6 and #48 makes you a bad team. Indiana is probably makes the tournament if they finish .500
Bohannon's a/to ratio is 3.40. Connor's is 4.81.If you want to go assist to turnover Bohannon is the best guard on the team. Toussaint is over 30% on his assist percentage but is the only one higher than Connor in turnover percentage
Connor has the worst PER on the team so no he does not provide value
You were the one who thought 25% was ridiculous and now you're back tracking that it's ridiculous considering Rasir's is higher.. You are fan boying wayyyy too hard right now lol.Being the best player on a bad team, doesn't prove anything.
The Big Ten is good at basketball though, so it's not really apples to apples.Are you really using the old Iowa State football schedule excuse?
Bohannon's a/to ratio is 3.40. Connor's is 4.81.
The Big Ten is good at basketball though, so it's not really apples to apples.
You can absolutely be the best player on a bad team, that wouldn't play for a good team.You were the one who thought 25% was ridiculous and now you're back tracking that it's ridiculous considering Rasir's is higher.. You are fan boying wayyyy too hard right now lol.
The number's you are using say they are an "estimate" based on 100 possessions. Not your best effort.Assist percentage
Connor - 24.5%
Bohannon - 23.9%
Turnover percentage
Connor - 17.5%
Bohannon - 13.2%
FIFYAnd the big 12 was decent at football then too.
JFC now you're saying Rasir wouldn't even play for Iowa???You can absolutely be the best player on a bad team, that wouldn't play for a good team.