The Fran fade
- Thread starter CyTwins
- Start date
If Iowa loses 4 more in the regular season, plus suffers a loss in the BIG Tournament, they would have 10 losses before the NCAA's. That's a 7 or 8 seed, right?
He’s more interested in ISU losing than ToE winning
You just can't give up 82 points a game an expect to win.
According to kenpom defensive efficiency....ISU is 128, the Hawks are 135. It's honestly kind of crazy they don't have more losses.
According to kenpom defensive efficiency....ISU is 128, the Hawks are 135. It's honestly kind of crazy they don't have more losses.
But Indiana has lost to Rutgers and Illinois since manhandling Iowa. Now 9-8 for the year. Surely even the Franster can figure out a way to win this next one.
kcbob79clone
Well-Known Member
Not so fast! A 1 seed due to the meat grinder of the schedule
Regression to the mean will be a real b*tch for them down the stretch.
kcbob79clone
Well-Known Member
Where are hawk idiots?
Just incredible that a team can get that hot from 3 and still lose. When your 7 foot goon not named Garza is making it rain at a 60% clip you should have no business losing. That takes such a tremendous lapse of execution on the other end of the floor. If Iowa isn't red hot from 3, and they were if you take away the 3 desperation air balls at the end of the game (wtf was that?), how ugly would this have been?
Still yelling at their TV's and wishing they played defense atleast as good as the Washington Generals.
The fade seems to have came extra early and twice as hard this year compared to normal years.
Fran fade is a real thing. They always start off good because they never have any one and done type guys. Then the other teams catch up and pass them.