You mean "stationery", like designed/headed paper? That makes some sense.And Murph just called it "stationary."
Effing weird.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean "stationery", like designed/headed paper? That makes some sense.And Murph just called it "stationary."
Effing weird.
And Murph just called it "stationary."
Effing weird.
This might be hard for you to believe but maybe the kids really do love Iowa football enough that they want to stick around and make it better instead of burning it all down and leaving.
Really impressed by the composure and depth of some of the tweets current players are sending out.
And by 5 PM Sunday also.Kirk would have approved most of them that I've seen
Everything you say is no sense. There's never been a time where you've said something useful on here.What nonsense have I spewed? Not what you interpret as nonsense but actual nonsense?
Kirk would have approved most of them that I've seen
Why are you getting so mad about that tidbit? We all were in agreement that the rule had to have been uplifted or else a ton of players were breaking the rule.Dochterman your source on this one too?
Kirk sure "doesn't seem to remember" a lot of really important things. I'm sure it's just coincidence.Thought this was an interesting quote by Kirk in a response to whether he told Doyle not to speak during this time..
“I don’t ever remember using the word silent,” Ferentz said Sunday. “I’ve always been a person who’s said you have to be cautious about what you put out. I’m not here to tell Chris what to do and wouldn’t. I would also suggest that when you feel you’re being wrongly accused of some thing and what have you done, then you want your day to voice your side of things, too. I can appreciate that. Just like our players, I’m not here to muzzle anyone or tell them what to say or what not to say."
I mean, that last statement is comical. You allowed each player one tweet per month and each tweet had to be vetted!
Dochterman your source on this one too?
It doesn't quite add up when a heavily-authoritarian, heavily-monitoring person such as a head coach doesn't know what goes on with his peers. And that's not just a Kirk thing, but he's certainly no different in that respect.Kirk sure "doesn't seem to remember" a lot of really important things. I'm sure it's just coincidence.
Why are you getting so mad about that tidbit? We all were in agreement that the rule had to have been uplifted or else a ton of players were breaking the rule.
No, @Brodie0 said nearly everyone called you an idiot.I am not mad at all since I was right about it. I sat here and told you all that the one per month limit and the approval process were not part of the new Twitter policy at Iowa and was told I was wrong.
"Good on Iowa for getting out in front of this"
-Andrew Downs
You seem really upset with Kirk about this rule he created and are trying to take it out on me
I am not mad at all since I was right about it. I sat here and told you all that the one per month limit and the approval process were not part of the new Twitter policy at Iowa and was told I was wrong.