You expect posters to believe your insight on the Bohanan family's relationship with Fran, but then you go to the classic "retread" post when others have insights that don't align with yours.
You are who you are, so no point in following you.
Yet here you are - yet again - debating with him. Who's the gullible one?
And you expect posters to believe your insights on the Hoiberg/Pollard relationship, with absolutely no evidence whatsoever.
Talk about no point in following.