What? Clemson finished against a team with inferior talent. ISU couldn't finish vs. a team with inferior talent. Seems like a pretty fair comparison to me.Imagine thinking a team has to have equal amounts of talent as Clemson to be considered good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What? Clemson finished against a team with inferior talent. ISU couldn't finish vs. a team with inferior talent. Seems like a pretty fair comparison to me.Imagine thinking a team has to have equal amounts of talent as Clemson to be considered good.
What? Clemson finished against a team with inferior talent. ISU couldn't finish vs. a team with inferior talent. Seems like a pretty fair comparison to me.
Finish? They survived a two point conversion, is that finishing?What? Clemson finished against a team with inferior talent. ISU couldn't finish vs. a team with inferior talent. Seems like a pretty fair comparison to me.
What? Clemson finished against a team with inferior talent. ISU couldn't finish vs. a team with inferior talent. Seems like a pretty fair comparison to me.
That's right. They got outplayed and outcoached the whole game...and won. That's finishing. Something ISU doesn't do.Finish? They survived a two point conversion, is that finishing?
Jesus Christ, you guys are really struggling to understand the concept here.It's the dumbest comparison. Clemson is MUCH better than Iowa State. And North Carolina is worse than Baylor.
That was definitely an int.I thought the call that was a LOT worse was Purdy's INT on his throw away. Was that even looked at, and if not, why didn't CMC have them look at that? That was NOT an INT. Not even close.
Jesus Christ, you guys are really struggling to understand the concept here.
If we aren't Clemson, we might as well give up! Sometimes I wonder why some of us are even Iowa State fans. It seems like it brings nothing but misery to a lot of people. If something made me as angry as it makes some of you, I wouldn't mess with it anymore. I stick with it because Iowa State football brings me more fun than anger. By a large margin over the last 10 years. Now, during the end of the Mac era, it brought me more misery and I stopped caring.
Thanks a lot Dan.ISU is now 8-25 in the state of Texas since the formation of the Big XII in 1996.
Do you think Matt Campbell is a good coach?Why are ‘we’ the ‘better’ team? We have a bigger stadium? We have a better fan base? We’re just ‘better’?
Can people be pissed after a loss?
This isn't like 2017 KSU loss angry (THAT was some anger) but this is disappointing seeing ISU not have it when it matters (so far---check back next week) in a season with legit talent returning.
It would more concerning if we got to the point of being apathetic like the last two years of the CPR era (at least I was--that KU thumping in '14 was basically funny).
Not dumb at all. UNC is better than BU. But that's not the point. Niether is the talent disparity between CU and ISU. The point is that the "next step" ISU team holds on against Iowa and BU. This isn't that team. The next step isn't happening this season.It's the dumbest comparison. Clemson is MUCH better than Iowa State. And North Carolina is worse than Baylor.
Finish? They survived a two point conversion, is that finishing?
Kolar’s PI was BS. Brian Griese was struggling.
That was definitely an int.
Not what I saw.So you can bobble the ball and then not get a foot down again before landing out of bounds?